Scientific Online Resource System

Bulgarian Review of Ophthalmology

Application of Rarebit Perimetry in Preperimetric Glaucoma

M. Benova, V. Shumnalieva, Y. Zdravkov, I. Tanev

Abstract

Aim: То determine the diagnostic capabilities of Rarebit perimetry for detection of early functional changes in primary open-angle glaucoma.

Methods: А total of 47 eyes divided into two groups: 23 eyes with preperimetric glaucoma (PPG) and a control group of 24 eyes were examined with Rarebit perimetry (RBP) and standard automated perimetry (SAP). То evaluate the differences between the groups were used Kruskal Wallis Test, Mann-Whitney Test and Fisher's Exact Test. The sensitivity and specificity of the RBP for detection of early glaucomatous changes were evaluated by ROC analysis using different algorithms.

Results: Average МНR for control and PPG group were respectively: 94.71% (SD 2.58); 87.61% (SD 4.80). Differences in МНR between the groups were statistically significant (Мann-Whitney Test, р <0.001). The highest value of AROC (0.849) was achieved when as abnormal was accepted Rarebit test with МНR <90% when comparing healthy eyes to those with PPG.

Conclusion: RBP is sensitive method for visual field defects in preperimetric glaucoma. The test is quick and easy to perform.


Keywords

standard automated perimetry; Rarebit perimetry; sensitivity; specificity

Full Text


References

Frisén L. New, sensitive window on abnormal spatial vision: rarebit probing Res. 2002 Jul;42(15):1931 9.

Kamdeu Fansi AA, Li G, Harasymowycz PJ. The validity of screening for open-angle glaucoma in high-risk populations with single-test screening mode frequency doubling technology perimetry (FDT). J Glaucoma. 2011 Mar;20(3):167-71.

Alencar LM, Medeiros FA. The role of standard automated perimetry and newer functional methods for glaucoma diagnosis and follow-up. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2011 Jan;59 Suppl:S53-8.

Martin L, Wanger P. New perimetric techniques: a comparison between rarebit and frequency doubling technology perimetry in normal subjects and glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma. 2004 Aug;13(4):268-72.

Kerrigan-Baumrind LA, Quigley HA, Pease ME, et al. Number of ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared with threshold visual field tests in the same persons. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:741-48.

Corallo G, Iester M, Scotto R, Calabria G, Traverso CE. Rarebit perimetry and frequency doubling technology in patients with ocular hypertension. Eur J Ophthalmol 2008 Mar-Apr; 18(2): 205-11.

Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Parisi L, Brusini P. Rarebit perimetry in normal subjects: testretest variability, learning effect, normative range, influence of optical defocus, and cataract extraction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007 Nov; 48(11): 5320- 31.

Vislisel JM, Doyle CK, Johnson CA. Variability of rarebit and standard perimetry sizes I and III in normals. Optom Vis Sci 2011; 88: 635-39.

Chin CF, Yip LW, Sim DC. Rarebit perimetry: normative values and test-retest variability. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2011; 39: 752-59.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14748/bro.v0i1.5232

Refbacks

Font Size


Article Tools
Email this article (Login required)
About The Authors

M. Benova

Bulgaria

V. Shumnalieva
Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University, `Alexandrovska` Hospital, Sofia
Bulgaria

Y. Zdravkov
Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University, `Alexandrovska` Hospital, Sofia
Bulgaria

I. Tanev
Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University, `Alexandrovska` Hospital, Sofia
Bulgaria

|