Scientific Online Resource System

Scripta Scientifica Medicinae Dentalis

Laboratory examination of cement thickness for zirconia and composite inlays cemented with two types of fixing agents

Milena Todorova Georgieva Dimitrova

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: During last decades glass ionomer (GICs) have shown an improvement in handling, less polymerization time, increasing the durability and better wear resistance. Resin composites cements are low viscosity composite materials. They are recommended for cementing ceramic and indirect composite restorations. The zirconia ceramics are not capable of etching for the purposes of cementation with composite fixing agents.

AIM: The aim of this article is to make a comparison assessment of the two types fixing agents used for the cementation of indirect aesthetic restorations using zirconium dioxide made via CAD/CAM technology and indirect composite.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: An experimental study of inlays – 60 made of indirect composite by a technician using the direct-indirect method and 60 made of zirconia ceramics by CAD/CAM technology, was conducted. The inlays were cemented with two types of cementing agents – GIC (Tokuyama Ionotite F) and dual-polymerizing cement (Tokuyama Estecem kit). The unit of observation was the thickness of the cementing agent.

RESULT: There was statistical significant difference (p<0.05) comparing groups, where the thickness of the fixing agent in the zirconia inlays is significantly smaller to the one in composite inlays. This applies to the dual-polymerizing cement (Tokuyama Estecem kit) as well as to GIC (Tokuyama Ionotite F). We could not find any statistically significant difference regarding fixing agent thickness neither in the group of indirect composite inlays nor in the zirconia ones (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION: Both types of cements show satisfying results regarding the thickness of the fixing agent in the four examined groups.


Keywords

restorations, glass-ionomer cements, dual-polymerizing cement, CAD/CAM technologies

Full Text


References

REFERENCES:

Wilson AD, Kent BE. A new translucent cement for dentistry. The glass ionomer cement. Br Dent J. 1972;132(4):33-5.

McDonald RE, Avery DR, Dean JA. Restorative Dentistry. In: Dean JA, Avery DR, McDonald RE, editors. McDonald and Avery dentistry for the child and adolescent.Mosby; 2008.pp. 322-42.

Studen-Pavlovich D, Pinkham JR, Adair SM. The dynamics of change. In: Casamassimo PS, Fields HW Jr., McTigue DJ, Nowak AJ, eds. Pediatric dentistry: infancy through adolescence. 5th ed.St. Louis, Mo.: Elsevier Saunders; 2012.pp.557-617.

Darr AH, Jacobsen PH. Conversion of dual cure luting cements. J Oral Rehabil. 1995;22(1):43-7.

Federlin M, Krifka S, Herpich M, Hiller KA, Schmalz G. Partial ceramic crowns: influence of ceramic thickness, preparation design and luting material on fracture resistance and marginal integrity in vitro. Oper Dent. 2007;32(3):251-60.doi:10.2341/06-70.

Sakaguchi RL, Ferracane J, Powers J. Craig's Restorative Dental Materials. Mosby;2012.pp. 211-51.

Latta MA, Barkmeier WW. Bond strength of a resin cement to a cured composite inlay material. J Prosth Dent. 1994; 72(2):189-93.

Shortall AC, Baylis RL, Wilson HJ. Composite inlay/luting resin bond strength- surface treatment effects. J Dent. 1996; 24(1-2):129- 35.

Giordano R, Sabrosa CE. Zirconia: material background and clinical application. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2010;31(9):710–5.

Sjogren G, Molin M, van Dijken JW. A 10-year prospective evaluation of CAD/CAM-manufactured (Cerec) ceramic inlays cemented with a chemically cured or dual-cured resin composite. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17(2):241-6.

Boitelle P1, Mawussi B, Tapie L, Fromentin O. A systematic review of CAD/CAM fit restoration evaluations. J Oral Rehabil. 2014;41(11):853-74.doi: 10.1111/joor.12205.

Al-Rabab’ah MA, Macfarlane TV, McCord JF. Vertical marginal and internal adaptation of all-ceramic copings made by CAD/CAM technology. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2008;16(3):109–15.

Hmaidouch R, Neumann P, Mueller W-D. Influence of preparation form, luting space setting and cement type on the marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM crown copings. Int J Comput Dent. 2011;14(3):219–26.

Aboushelib MN, Elmahy WA, Ghazy MH. Internal adaptation, marginal accuracy and microleakage of a pressable versus a machinable ceramic laminate veneers. J Dent. 2012;40(8):670–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.04.019.

Estafan D, Dussetschleger F, Agosta C, Reich S. Scanning electron microscope evaluation of CEREC II and CEREC III inlays. Gen Dent. 2003;51(5):450–4.

Rungruanganunt P, Kelly JR, Adams DJ. Two imaging techniques for 3D quantification of pre-cementation space for CAD/CAM crowns. J Dent. 2010;38(12):995–1000. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.08.015.

Bindl A, Mormann WH. Fit of all-ceramic posterior fixed € partial denture frameworks in vitro. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2007;27(6):567–75.

Son Y-H, Han C-H, Kim S. Influence of internal-gap width and cement type on the retentive force of zirconia copings in pullout testing. J Dent. 2012;40(10):866–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.07.007.

Alaghemand H, Abolghasemzadeh F, Pakdel F, Judi Chelan R. Comparison of microleakage and thickness of resin cement in ceramic inlays with various temperatures. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2014;8(1):45-50. doi: 10.5681/joddd.2014.008.

Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Miller KA, Shams M. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: fluoride release and influence on Streptococcus mutans growth. Eur J Oral Sci. 1997;105(1):81–5.

Van Dijken JWV, Örmin A, Olofsson AL. Clinical performance of pressed inlays luted with resin-modified glass ionomer and autopolymerizing resin composite cements. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82(5):529–35. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(99)70051-x.

Hopp CD, Land MF. Considerations for ceramic inlays in posterior teeth: a review. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2013;5:21-32. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S42016.

Bielen V, Inokoshi M, Munck JD, Zhang F, Vanmeensel K, Minakuchi S, et al. Bonding effectiveness to differently sandblasted dental zirconia. J Adhes Dent. 2015;17:235–42. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a34401.

Vallée J, Noble WH, Gupta S, Schulze KA, Hakim F. Selection guidelines for all-ceramic restorations. Decis Dent. 2017;3(3):24–8.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14748/ssmd.v5i1.5905

Refbacks

About The Author

Milena Todorova Georgieva Dimitrova
Medical University of Varna
Bulgaria

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine

Font Size


|