Scientific Online Resource System

Scripta Scientifica Salutis Publicae

Bulgarian physicians and nurses vs. electronic health records as a major issue of e-health

Iskra Slavcheva Mircheva, Martin Mirchev, Veselinka Nestorova

Abstract

Introduction. Despite the numerous e-health applications, e-health cannot be implemented without the development and implementation of electronic health records (EHRs). The main barriers to the deployment of its systems are the lack of funding, infrastructure, capacity and legal framework, as well as the insufficient computer literacy of medical staff.

Aim. The aim of this article is to assess the computer literacy of Bulgarian physicians and nurses, their attitude to e-health, especially EHRs as a major issue of e-health, including the ownership of medical data.

Material and Methods. An enquiry comprising 33 questions is used. Respondents of the study are physicians and nurses from five regional and university hospitals in the North-eastern region of Bulgaria. Some of the results are compared to those of a study, carried out in 1999 among the physicians in Bulgaria. Several signs are discussed: self-evaluation of the experience in using computers, general attitude to eHealth, attitude to EHRs, including ownership of medical data.

Results. The overall self-evaluation in using computers is 4.16 for physicians and 3.74 for nurses (max=6.00). The greatest need for additional training is in the use of statistical (47.98% of the physicians and 39.24% of the nurses) and specialized software (48.34% of the physicians and 49.65% of the nurses). Only 17.7% of the physicians and 14.89% of the nurses are familiar with the principles of e-health. Only 21.8% of the physicians and 25.8% of the nurses consider that the country is ready for the implementation of e-health. Almost all, 90.4% of the physicians and 82% of the nurses recognize the need for EHRs. About half of the physicians (46.1%) and 22.2% of the nurses would use an EHR system if they have adequate software. Physicians and nurses are not aware of what actually EHRs are. Most (74.5%) of the physicians and 69.3% of the nurses consider the implementation of personal health cards (presumably PHR), as a prerequisite for the implementation of e-health. The two preferred suggestions for the ownership of medical data are general practitioners (preferred by 28.3% of the physicians in 1999, 30.9% - in 2013, and 40.55% of the nurses) and the patient himself, preferred by 10.4% of the physicians in 1999, 29.38% - in 2013 and 26% of the nurses.

Conclusions. Bulgarian physicians and nurses need additional education and training in using specialized, graphical and statistical software. The overall computer literacy of Bulgarian physicians and nurses is not adequate for the use of EHRs. They need additional education on the principles of eHealth, including EHRs, i.e. education in health informatics.


Keywords

physicians; nurses; e-health; EHRs; ownership of medical data

Full Text


References

Docteur E, Oxley H. Health care systems: the lessons from the reform experience, OECD working papers. OECD: Paris; 2003.

Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions eHealth Action Plan 2012-2020 - Innovative healthcare for the 21st century, Brussels, 6.12.2012, COM(2012) 736 final.

Kruse CS, Krowski N, Rodriguez B, Tran L, Vela J, Brooks M. Telehealth and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and narrative analysis. BMJ Open. 2017; 7 (8):e016242. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016242.

https://www.cma.ca/En/Pages/The-digital-world-Good-or-bad-for-MDs.aspx. accessed 2.05.2018

https://www.statista.com/statistics/, accessed 25.05.2018

https://www.statista.com/statistics/286079/internet-activities-in-great-britain-by-gender/ accessed: 16.05.2018

Fox S, Duggan M. Health Online 2013. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center. 2013.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/625034/mobile-health-app-downloads/ accessed 16.05.2018

Tan SSL, Goonawardene N. Internet health information seeking and the patient-physician relationship: A systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2017; 19(1): e9. doi:10.2196/jmir.5729.

Resolution WHA58.33. Sustainable health financing, universal coverage and social health insurance. In: Fifty-eighth World Health Assembly, Geneva, 16-25 May 2005. Resolutions and decisions annex. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005.

Pringle M. Using computers to take patient histories. BMJ. 1988;297(6650):697-8.

Holdsworth MT, Fichtl RE, Raisch DW, Hewryk A, Behta M, Mendez-Rico E, et al. Impact of computerized prescriber order entry on the incidence of adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients. Pediatrics. 2007;120(5):1058-66.

Bates DW. Computerized physician order entry and medication errors: finding a balance. J Biomed Inform. 2005; 38(4):259-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2005.05.003.

Bates DW, Kuperman GJ, Wang S, Gandhi T, Kittler A, Volk L, et al. Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10(6):523-30. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1370.

Garg AX, Adhikari NKJ, McDonald H, Rosas-Arellano MP, Devereaux PJ, Beyene J et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005;293(10):1223-38. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.10.1223.

Kuperman GJ, Bobb AM, Payne T, Avery AJ, Gandhi TK, Burns G, et al. Medication-related clinical decision support in computerized provider order entry systems: a review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14(1):29-40. doi:10.1197/jamia.M2170.

Barber N, Cornford T, Klecun E. Qualitative evaluation of an electronic prescribing and administration system. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007;16(4):271-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.019505.

Bates DW. Preventing medication errors: a summary. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007;64(14 Suppl 9):S3-9. doi: 10.2146/ajhp070190.

Pagliari C, Sloan D, Gregor P, Sullivan F, Kahan JP, Detmer D, et al. Literature review and conceptual map of the field of eHealth. Final report to the SDO programme; 2004.

Hersh WR, Hickam DH, Severance SM, Dana TL, Pyle KK, Helfand M. Diagnosis, access and outcomes: Update of a systematic review of telemedicine services. J Telemed Telecare. 2006;12(S2):S3-31. doi: 10.1258/135763306778393117.

van Langenhove P, Decreus K, Rogala A, Olyslaegers T, Whitehouse D. eHealth European Interoperability Framework. Vision on eHealth EIF, a study prepared for the European Commission by the Deloitte team, Version 1.2, EC, Brussels; 2013.

WHO. Global diffusion of eHealth: making universal health coverage achievable. Report of the third global survey on eHealth. Geneva; 2016.

Feschieva N, Mircheva I. Proofs of the necessity of medical informatics for the physicians in Bulgaria, In: Patel V, Rogers R, Haux R, editors. Proceedings of MedInfo 2001, Vol.84 Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, IOS Press, The Netherlands, part two; 1019:1023; 2001.

Mircheva I. E-health and the need for education in biomedical and health informatics for the physicians in Bulgaria. Scr Sci Salutis Publicae. 2016; 2(1):23-9.

Technical report Health informatics - Electronic health record - Definition, scope and context, ISO/TR 20514; 2005.

The National Alliance for health information technology. Report to the Office of the national coordinator for health information technology on Defining key health information technology terms. April 28, 2008.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14748/sssp.v4i0.5080

Refbacks

About The Authors

Iskra Slavcheva Mircheva
Medical University of Varna
Bulgaria

Head of Department "Social medicine and healthcare organization"

Martin Mirchev
Medical University of Varna
Bulgaria

Department "Social medicine and healthcare organization"

Veselinka Nestorova
Medical University of Varna
Bulgaria

Head of Department "Physiotherapy, rehabilitation, thalassotherapy, occupational diseases"

Font Size


|