Aim: The aim of the study was to examine objectively the visual analyzer function by pattern electroretinography (PERG) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) with initial diabetic retinopathy (DR) and to compare the results with the control group as well as according to the type of diabetes. Material and methods: A group of 81 people (162 eyes) were studied. Patients with DM were 34 (68 eyes), 11 patients with type 1 DM and 23 with type 2 DM. The control group consisted of 47 healthy individuals (94 eyes). PERG was performed. The main variables that were considered in the results analysis were the latency and amplitudes, reflecting the configuration of the wave forms.
Results: The comparative analysis of PERG components between patients with DM with DR and controls as well as according to the type of DM demonstrated significant differences. In latencies, significant differences were found for component P50 at all electrode positions at 15o and 30o. Patients with DM had significantly longer latencies and lower amplitudes compared to the control group. In the comparative analysis according to the type of DM, significant differences were found in amplitude component P50-N95 at 15o and 30o in the right eye, which confirms the asymmetrical eye involvement in DM. The PERG amplitudes in type 2 DM were significantly lower than those of type 1 DM patients.
Conclusion: PERG could be used as an objective method for registration of early changes in the visual analyzer function as a DM complication. Also, to monitor the changes in dynamics as it is non-invasive, harmless, faster, and less expensive than fluorescein angiography (FA), OCT and angio-OCT.
Танкова Цв., Захарен диабет, Парадигма, 2013, стр. 56-373.
American Academy of Ophthalmology, Basic and Clinical Science Course 2017-2018, Section 12 Retina and vitreous, chapter 5, 89-111
Antonetti DA., Barber AJ., Bronson SK. et al. Diabetic retinopathy: seeing beyond glucose-induced microvascular disease. Diabetes, 2006, 55(9), 2401-2411.
Arden GB., Hamilton AM., Wilson- Holt J. et al. Pattern electroretinograms become abnormal when background diabetic retinopathy deteriorates to a preproliferative stage: possible use as a screening test. Br. J. Ophthalmol., 1986, 70(5), 330-335.
Bach M., Brigell MG., Hawlina M. et al. ISCEV standard for clinical pattern electroretinography (PERG) (2012 update). Doc. Ophthalmol., 2013, 126, 1–7.
Boschi MC., Frosini R., Mencucci R. et al. The influence of early diabetes on the pattern electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol, 1989, 71, 369-374.
Bresnick GH., Palta M. Temporal aspects of the electroretinogram in diabetic retinopathy. Arch. Ophthalmol., 1987, 105(5), 660-664.
Caputo S, Di Leo MA., Falsini B. Evidence for early impairment of macular function with pattern ERG in type I diabetic patients. Diabetes Care, 1990, 13(4), 412–418.
Ewing FM., Deary IJ., Strachan MW. Et al. Seeing beyond retinopathy in diabetes: electrophysiological and psychophysical abnormalities and alterations in vision. Endocr. Rev., 1998, 19(4), 462-76.
Fishman GA., Birch DG., Holder GE. Et al. Electrophysiologic testing in disorders of the retina, optic nerve and visual pathway. 2nd ed., The Foundation of The American Academy of Ophthalmoilogy, Ophthalmology monographs, 2001, 87-111.
Kim SJ., Song SJ., Yu H.G. Multifocal electroretinogram responses of the clinically normal retinal areas in diabetes. Ophthalmic. Res., 2007, 39(5), 282-288.
Pescosolido N., Barbato A., Stefanucci A. et al. Role of electrophysiology in the early diagnosis and follow-up of diabetic retinopathy. Journal of Diabetes Research, 2015, Article ID319692, 8 pages.
Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care, 2003, 26, 5-20
Sivakumar R., Ravindran G., Muthayya M. et al. Diabetic retinopathy analysis. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, 2005, 1, 20–27.
Email this article (Login required) 
