Scientific Online Resource System

Bulgarian Review of Ophthalmology

Pneumatic vitreolysis in the treatment of vitreomacular traction syndrome: a comparison of pneumatic vitreolysis and combined pneumatic vitreolysis with simultaneous cataract surgery

Martina Milkovska

Abstract

Introduction: Vitreomacular traction (VMT) syndrome is characterized by an incomplete posterior vitreous detachment and the occurrence of subsequent anterior-posterior traction in the macular region, leading to morphological and functional changes.

Aim: The aim of the study is to analyze the results in the treatment of phakic eyes with vitreomacular traction syndrome by two methods: application of pneumatic vitreolysis and a combined approach—cataract extraction (phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation) together with pneumatic vitreolysis simultaneously.

Materials and Methods: A total of 12 patients (13 eyes) with vitreomacular traction syndrome, aged 59 to 87 years (mean 70.5 ± 8.4 years), divided into two groups were included:

Group 1 (10 eyes): Patients without accompanying cataract or with cataract at an early stage of development, who underwent a single 27G-pars plana intravitreal application of 0.2cc 100% sulfur hexafluoride (SF6).

Group 2 (3 eyes): Patients with accompanying cataract who underwent phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation and 27G-pars plana intravitreal application of 0.2cc 100% sulfur hexafluoride (SF6).

Results: We observed a mean success rate of pneumatic vitreolysis of 69.2% in all treated patients (70% for Group 1, 66.7% for Group 2).

Conclusion: Pneumatic vitreolysis with expanding gas has very good results in the treatment of foveallocalized vitreomacular traction syndrome. Given the age of patients suffering from this disease and the likelihood of concomitant cataracts, the possibility of combining pneumatic vitreolysis with cataract surgery should be considered in the treatment plan. One-step application saves time and results in faster visual recovery and greater patient satisfaction.


Keywords

pneumatic vitreolysis, vitreomacular traction syndrome, sulfur hexafluoride, cataract surgery, phacoemulsification

Full Text


References

Shah SU, Tripathy K, Bhagat N, Lim JI, Karth PA, Gullapalli V. Vitreomacular traction syndrome. 2021. Available at: https://eyewiki.aao.org/Vitreomacular _ Traction _ Syndrome.

Sonmez K, Capone A, Trese MT, Williams GA. Vitreomacular traction syndrome: impact of anatomical configuration on anatomical and visual outcomes. Retina. 2008;28(9):1207–14. doi: 10.1097/ IAE.0b013e31817b6b0f.

Dabov B. Vitreoretinal surgery. Steno; 2002. (in Bulgarian).

Koerner F, Garweg J. Vitrectomy for macular pucker and vitreomacular traction syndrome. Doc Ophthalmol. 1999;97(3-4):449–58. doi: 10.1023/a:1002412323399.

Stalmans P, Benz MS, Gandorfer A, Kampik A, Girach A, Pakola S, et al. Enzymatic vitreolysis with ocriplasmin for vitreomacular traction and macular holes. N Eng J Med. 2012;367(7):606–15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1110823.

Chan CK, Wessels IF, Friedrichsen EJ. Treatment of idiopathic macular holes by induced posterior vitreous detachment. Ophthalmology. 1995;102(5):757–67. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(95)30958-x.

Day S, Martinez JA, Nixon PA, Levitan M, Dooner JW, Wong RW, et al. Intravitreal sulfur hexafluoride injection for the treatment of vitreomacular traction syndrome. Retina. 2016;36:733–7.

Schneider EW, Johnson MW. Emerging nonsurgical methods for the treatment of vitreomacular adhesion: a review. Clin Ophthalmol. 2011;5:1151–65. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S14840

Mirshahi A, Höhn F, Lorenz K, Hattenbach LO. Incidence of posterior vitreous detachment after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(6):987-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.02.016.

Mantopoulos D, Prenner JL, Patel VK, Roth DB, Shah SP, Tsavaris O, Fine HF, Wheatley HM. The effect of elective cataract extraction by phacoemulsification in eyes with vitreomacular traction syndrome. Retina. 2021;41(1):75-81. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002785. PMID: 32106158.

Devgan U. If you see VMT on OCT do not do cataract surgery! 2018. Available from: https://cataractcoach.com

Panagiotidis D, Karagiannis D, Theodossiadis P, Alonistiotis D, Charonis A, Tsoumbris I, et al. Cataract-related acute vitreomacular traction syndrome. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2011;21(1):20-3. doi: 10.5301/ejo.2010.521.

Gruchociak S, Djerada Z, Afriat M, Chia V, Santorini M, Denoyer A, et al. Comparing intravitreal air and gas for the treatment of vitreomacular traction. Retina. 2020;40(11):2140-7. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002733.

Melberg NS, Thomas MA. Nuclear sclerotic cataract after vitrectomy in patients under 50 years of age. Ophthalmology. 1995;102(10):1466‐71. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(95)30844-5.

Gandorfer A, Rohleder M, Kampik A. Epiretinal pathology of vitreomacular traction syndrome. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(8):902– 9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.86.8.902.

Ogura Y, Tsukada T, Negi A, Honda Y. Integrity of the blood-ocular barrier after intravitreal gas injection. Retina. 1989;9(3):199-202.

Chan CK, Mein CE, Crosson JN. Pneumatic vitreolysis for management of symptomatic focal vitreomacular traction. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2017;12(4):419-23. doi: 10.4103/jovr.jovr_146_17.

Steel DHW, Patton N, Stappler T, Karia N, Hoerauf H, Patel N, et al. Ocriplasmin for vitreomacular traction in clinical practice: The INJECT Study. Retina. 2021;41(2):266-76. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002862.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14748/bro.v68i1.9353

Refbacks

Font Size


About The Author

Martina Milkovska
VISION Eye Hospital, Sofia
Bulgaria

|