Scientific Online Resource System

Conference Proceedings


Lachezar Popov, Diana Dimitrova


The article explores an aspect of American writer Lois Lowry`s award-winning adolescent novel The Giver (1993) that has not been sufficiently examined in criticism, namely, the author`s stance toward the general enthusiasm among scientists and politicians about the possibilities opened by the latest advances in science and technology to perfect human societies and improve the individual subject`s experience of life. Presenting the failure of a utopian project based on all-pervading social control and, on the other hand, biotechnology, the novel offers a cautionary tale against the dangers stemming from instrumental, soulless biopolitics. Lowry believes that public order and epidemiological control promoted by technocrats can give us physical safety, but can take a toll on our emotional health and intellectual development. As an alternative to the technocratic utopia Lois Lowry`s novel proposes social spaces organized on the basis of sentiment as the most natural political arrangement that guarantees human happiness and the fulfilment of human potential.


contemporary American literature, biopolitics, biotechnology

Full Text


Achtemeier 1985: Harper's Bible Dictionary. Ed. Paul J. Achtemeier. San Francis-co: Harper & Row, 1985.

Barker-Benfield 1992: Barker-Benfield, G. J. The Culture of Sensibility: Sex and Society in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1992.

Dupré 2005: Dupré, Louis. The Enlightenment and the Intellectual Foundations of Modern Culture. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005.

a. Foucault 2001: Foucault, Michel. “Body/ Power.” Foucault.Info. Anonymous.

b. Foucault 1995: Discipline and Punish: The Birth of Prison. New York: Random House, Inc., 1995.

c. Foucault 1984: The History of Sexuality. The Foucault Reader. Ed. Paul Rabinow. New York: Pantheon Books, 1984. 258-90.

Graham 2002: Graham, Elaine. Representations of the Post/ Human: Monsters, Aliens, and Others in Popular Culture. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2002.

Hanson 2009: Hanson, Carter F. “The Utopian Function of Memory in Lois Low-ry’s The Giver.” Extrapolation. 1/ 2009: 50-68.

Latham 2004: Latham, Don. “Discipline and Its Discontents: A Foucauldian Read-ing of The Giver.” Children's Literature. 2/ 2004: 134-51.

Michael 1997: Levy, Michael. “Lois Lowry’s The Giver: Interrupted Bildungsro-man or Ambiguous Dystopia?” Fountain 70. 2/ 1997: 50-57.

Lowry 1993: Lowry, Lois. The Giver. New York: Delacote Press, 1993.

Pelletier 2015: Pelletier, Kevin. Apocalyptic Sentimentalism: Love and Fear in U.S. Antebellum Literature. University of Georgia Press: Atlanta, 2015.

Schneider 2009: Schneider, Susan. “Future Minds: Transhumanism, Cognitive Enhancement, and the Nature of Persons.” The Penn Center Guide to Bioethics. Eds. Authur L. Caplan, Feister, and Ravitski. New York: Springer Publishing Com-pany, LLC, 2009. 95-110.

Scholes 1969: Scholes, Robert. “Towards a Poetics of Fiction: An Approach through Genre.” Novel: A Forum on Fiction. 2/ 1969: 101-111.

Stewart 2007: Stewart, Susan. “A Return to Normal: Lois Lowry’s The Giver.” The Lion and the Unicorn. 1/ 2007: 21-35.


Font Size