Scientific Online Resource System

Health Economics and Management

Working capacity and return to the labor market of patients with endoprosthesis

Gergana Nenova

Abstract

Musculoskeletal conditions are common among all age groups and present a serious risk of aggravation in quality of life, especially in patients of working age. In this context, endoprosthesis and the concomitant early kinesitherapy at the appropriate time in the life of the patient with musculoskeletal disorder offer an opportunity for a positive change in the quality of life. The aim of the study is to compare the course of the recovery period, the possibilities of premature workload, return to daily life and working capacity after hip arthroplasty in middle-aged patients. The subject of this paper are the changes in the functional tests of the patients after hip endoprothesis with an individual femur and induviduals with conventional hip replacement, who have undergone kinesitherapy treatment. Anthorpometric and statistical methods are the basis of the research methodology. The developed and applied kinesitherapy methodology in patients with individual femoral stem proves better functional results after its application in cases of patients of working age.

Keywords

kinesitherapy; working capacity; hip arthroplasty

Full Text


References

Манчева П. Инвалидност с ТЕЛК – проблеми и решения. 2018; МУ – Варна; СТЕНО ISBN 978-954-449-968-6; ISBN 978-619-221-142-4.

Михов К. Двуполюсно тазобедрено ендопротезиране. Съвременни проблеми и концепции. МУ „Проф. д-р Параскев Стоянов“ – Варна: Стено; 2018.

Cichy B, Wilk M, Sliwinski Z. Changes in gait parameters in total hip arthroplasty patients before and after surgery. Medical Science Monitor. 2008; 14: 159–169.

Crowe J, Henderson J. Pre-arthroplasty rehabilitation is effective in reducing hospital stay. Can J Occup Ther. 2003; 70: 88–96.

Dennis M, Moffet H, Caron F, Ouellet D, Paquet J, Nolet L. Effectiveness of continuous passive motion and conventional physical therapy after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther. 2006; 86(2): 174–185.

Flecher X, Parratte S, Aubaniac JM, et al. Three-dimensional custom-designed cementless femoral stem for osteoarthritis secondary to congenital dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2007; 89:1586.

Giaquinto S, Ciotola E, Margutti F, Valentini F. Gait during hydrokinesitherapy following total hip arthroplasty. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2003; 29(9): 743–749.

Mancheva P. Does the TEMP-decision contribute to the restoration of the employability? Journal of IMAB. 2020; 26(1): 2921–2925.

Mihov, K., M. Zagorov, Sv. Dobrilov, A. Tabakov, G. Nenova. Custom hip arthroplasty. Scripta Scientifica Medica, 2016, 48(3): 19–26.

Munin MC, Rudy TE, Glynn NW, Crossett LS, Rubash HE. Early inpatient rehabilitation after elective hip and knee arthroplasty. JAMA. 1998; 279: 847–852.

O’Driscoll SW, Giori NJ. Continuous passive motion (CPM): Theory and principles of clinical application. J Res.& Dec. 2000; 37: 179–188.

Wettstein M, Mouhsine E, Argenson JN, et al. Three-dimensional computed cementless custom femoral stems in young patients: Midterm follow up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 437: 169.

Zagorov, M., K., Mihov, S., Dobrilov, A., Tabakov, A., Gospodinov, G., Nenova. Dual Mobility Cups Reduce Dislocation Rate in Total Hip Arthroplasty for Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures. Journal of IMAB, 2018 Apr-Jun, 24(2): 2077–2081.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14748/hem.v19i3.6603

Refbacks

Font Size


|