There is a wide range of options in the reconstruction of the anatomically, functionally and cosmetically challenging region of head and neck. The pectoralis major flap has proven its reliability and versatility. We present our personal experience with this flap.
----------------------------------
В реконструкцията на комплицирана от анатомофизологична и козметична точка област на главата и шията се използва голямо разнообразие от педикулизирани и свободни ламба. Миокутанното ламбо от големия гръден мускул е доказало своята надеждност и многостранна приложимост. Представяме собствения си опит и дискутираме предимствата и недостатъците на този реконструктивен метод.
Hueston JT, McConchie IH A compound pectoral flap Aust NZ J Surg 1968; 38: 61
Ariyan S. The pectoralis major myocutaneous flap. A versatile flap for reconstruction in the head and neck. Plast Reconstr Surg 1979; 63: 73-81.
Начев
Dolan RW Regional and free flaps In Facial Plastic, Reconstructive, and Trauma Surgery Marcel Dekker Inc. 2003; 239-240.
Schusterman MA, Miller MJ, Reece GP et al. A single center’s experience with 308 free flaps for repair of head and neck cancer defects Plastic Reconstr Surg 1994; 93: 472-478.
Kroll SS, Evans GRD, Goldberg D et al. A comparison of resource costs for head and neck reconstruction with free and pectoralis major flaps Plastic Renconstr Surg 1997; 99: 1282-1286.
Tsue TT, Desyatnikova SS, Deleyiannis FWB et al. Comparison of cost and function in reconstruction of the posterior oral cavity and oropharynx – free vs pedicled soft tissue transfer Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 123: 731-737.
Magee WP Jr, McCraw JB, Horton CE, McInnis WD Pectoralis “paddle” myocutanous flaps: the workhorse of head and neck reconstruction Am J Surg 1980; 140: 507-513.
Schuller DE Pectoralis myocutaneous flap in head and neck cancer reconstruction Arch Otolaryngol 1983; 109: 185-189.
