Introduction: Radical cystectomy with extended pelvic lymph node dissection is the standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The aim of this study is to report our initial experience of our series of 22 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical cystectomy with different urinary diversion.
Materials and Methods: Between March 2015 and March 2016, 22 patients underwent
laparoscopic radical cystectomy with different types of extracorporeal urinary diversion. Patients were aged 54 to 85 (average age 66.3) with different clinical stages of the disease.
Transperitoneal laparoscopic radical cystectomy with five ports in all cases was performed with bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection.
Results: In 5 cases we performed radical cystectomy with subsequent ureterocutaneostomy, in 7 cases we performed ileal conduit according to the method of Bricker, and in 10 cases we formed orthotopic bladder from ileal loop by the method of Hautmann. All operations were performed with an average blood loss of 270 ml, with an average operating time of 5 hours, and an average hospital stay of 7 days. No conversion was required in any case. The patients were observed postoperatively. Early complications (within 30 days) occurred in 2 patients, and late complications occurred in 3 patients.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic radical cystectomy is possible, although technically difficult, with significant reduction in patient morbidity. With more experience and an improvement of the surgical technique, laparoscopic radical cystectomy with different types of derivation becomes an alternative surgical method for treating patients with localised muscle invasive bladder carcinoma.
O`Dea M, Furlow W. Nephropexy: fact or fiction? Urology 1976;8:9-12.
Hubner WA, Schramek P, Pfliiger H. Laparoscopic nephropexy. J Urol 1994;152:1184-1187.
Elashry OM, Nakada SY, McDougall EM, Clayman RV. Laparoscopic nephropexy: Washington University experience. J Urol 1995;154:1655-1659.
Hahn E. Die operative Behandlung der beweglichen Niere durch Fixation. Zentralbl. Chir. 1881; 29: 449- 556.
Harrison LH, Glenn JF. Nephropexy. Urol. Surg. 1969; 3: 253-5.
Wandschneider G, Haas P, Leb G, Passath A. Indika- tionsstellung und Erfolgsbeurteilung der Nephropexie mit Hilfe der kombinierten Isotopenuntersuchung der Nieren. Urologe A 1972; 3: 161-9.
Wandschneider G. Results and problems of nephropexy. Urologe 1966; 5: 129-32.
Hoenig DM, Hemal AK, Shaihav AL, Clayman RV. Nephroptosis: A `disparaged` condition revisited. Urol- ogy 1999; 54: 590-6.
Boeminghaus H. Urologie. Werk Verlag, München- Grafeling, 1971.
Fornara P, Doehn C, Jocham D. Laparoscopic neph- ropexy: 3-year experience. J. Urol. 1997; 158: 1679-83.
McDougall EM, Afane JS, Dunn MD, Collyer WC, Clayman RV. Laparoscopic nephropexy: Long-term follow-up. Washington University experience. J. Endourol. 2000; 14: 247-50.
Rassweiler JJ, Frede T, Recker F, Stock C, Seemann O, Alken P. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephropexy. Urol. Clin. North Am. 2001; 28: 137-44.
Harrison, LH. Nephropexy. In: Urologid Surgery, 3rd ed. Edited by J. F. Glenn. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Co., pp. 253-355, 1983.
Hubner WA, Schramek P, Pfluger H. Laparoscopic nephropexy. J. Urol. 1994; 152: 1184-7.
Matsui Y, Matsuta Y, Okubo K, Yoshimura K. International Journal of Urology (2004) 11, 1-6