It is generally comprehended that pathological phenomena have their analogies in the norm. Performing a study of poetical speech allows for certain identification of formal analogy between paronyms, neologisms (coinages?), new word groups, iterations, etc, as well as well known aphasic phenomena. Such a comparison suggests their consideration (examining) as manifestations of specific prevalence and disbalance, in one case (the poetic speech), and dysfunction in the other case (the aphasic speech), of certain speech-forming and brain mechanics. This kind of study does not concern the radical difference in the subject and product of speech, and the communication resultant in poetic and aphasic speech.
Мавлов, Л. Психология, 1977, № 4, 225-231.
Попов, Г. Неврол., психиатр, и неврохирург., 1990, №6, 16-22.
Caramazza, А., А. Е. H i l l i s . Nature, 349, 1991,788-790.
Damasio, A. R. New Engl. J. Med., 326, 1992, 531-539.
Damasio, H . , et al. Nature, 380, 1996,499-505.
Hillis, A. E . , A . Caramazza. J . Cogn. Neurosci., 7, 1995, 396-407.
Jakobson, R. Essais de linguistique generate. Les fondations du langage. Paris, Les editions de Minuit, 1963.
Seron, X . , M. Jeannerod. Neuropsychologic humaine. Liege, Editions P. Mardaga.
Email this article (Login required) 
