Objectives:
Patients with traumatic central cord syndrome (TCCS) provide some of the most dramatic opportunities for neurological improvement when compared to other subgroups of SCI, particularly evident in young patients with TCCS. The purpose of this study is to review a series of patients with central cord syndrome and to corroborate the consensus about optimal treatment and surgical timing for decompression.
Materials and Methods:
Patients developing this suffering belong to two relative categories - the first group are relatively young patients with a high-energy injury that leads to fracture/subluxation or dislocation. The second category are older individuals who, due to a low-energy fall or cervical hyperextension injury present with TCCS that occurs in the presence of cervical spondylosis but without obvious injury to the spinal column. The main tool for refinement of the operative window was ASIA motor score.
Results:
Thirty-two patient were divided in two groups - patients with ASIA motor score less than or equal to 50 p. (mean - 42.4 p.) - 10, and patients with a score higher than 50 p. (mean - 67.45 p.) - 22. Patients with ASIA Mscores less than 50 p. were operated within 24 hours, but 2 patients from these - within 20 days. Patients with ASIA Mscore higher than 50 p. underwent decompression within 72 hours. All patients sustained improvement in neurological status with the exception of these two, who underwent late decompression.
Discussion:
These cases clearly demonstrate to what range should operative activity be targeted in patients with TCCS. Patients with ASIA Mscore 80 and above, with MRI fracture evidence and those who may have already experienced significant motor improvement between the time of injury and the moment of initial neurological evaluation, may undergo delayed surgical treatment.
Conclusions:
There was a recommendation based on low-quality evidence that early (as soon as feasible) surgical decompression for patients with TCCS and spondylosis should be recommended when their initial neurological impairment is significant.
Merriam WF, Taylor TK, Ruff SJ, et al. A reappraisal of acute traumatic central cord syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986;68:708-13.
Bosch A, Stauffer S, Nickel VL. Incomplete traumatic quadriplegia. A tenyear review. JAMA. 1971;216:473-8.
Schneider RC, Cherry G, Pantek H. The syndrome of acute central cervical spinal cord injury, with special reference to the mechanics involved in hyperextension injuries of the cervical spine. J Neurosurg. 1954;11:546 -77.
Bridle MJ. Long term function following the central cord syndrome. Paraplegia. 1990;28:178-85.
Newey ML, Sen PK, Fraser RD. The long-term outcome after central cord syndrome: a study of the natural history. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:851-5.
Bose B, Northrup BE, Osterholm JL, et al. Reanalysis of central cervical cord injury management. Neurosurgery. 1984;15:367-72.
Brodkey JS, Miller CF Jr, Harmody RM. The syndrome of acute central cervical spinal cord injury revisited. Surg Neurol. 1980;14:251-7.
Chen TY, Lee ST, Lui TN, et al. Efficacy of surgical treatment in traumatic central cord syndrome. Surg Neurol. 1997;48:435-40.
Chen TY, Dickman CA, Eleraky M, et al. The role of decompression for acute incomplete cervical spinal cord injury in cervical spondylosis. Spine. 1998;23:2398 - 403.
Dai L, Jia L, Ni B, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of acute central cervical cord injury. Chin Med J (Engl). 1998;111:351-3.
Dai L, Jia L. Central cord injury complicating acute cervical disc herniation in trauma. Spine. 2000;25:331-5.
Guest J, Eleraky MA, Apostolides PJ, et al. Traumatic central cord syndrome: results of surgical management. J Neurosurg. 2002;97:25-32.
Roth EJ, Lawler MH, Yarkony GM. Traumatic central cord syndrome: clinical features and functional outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990;71:18 -23.
Shrosbree RD. Acute central cervical spinal cord syndrome-aetiology, age incidence and relationship to the orthopaedic injury. Paraplegia. 1977;14: 251- 8.
Tow AM, Kong KH. Central cord syndrome: functional outcome after rehabilitation. Spinal Cord. 1998;36:156-60.
Dvorak MF, Fisher CG, Hoekema J, et al. Factors predicting motor recovery and functional outcome after traumatic central cord syndrome: a long term follow up. Spine. 2005;30:2303-11.
Ishida Y, Tominaga T. Predictors of neurologic recovery in acute central cervical cord injury with only upper extremity impairment. Spine. 2002;27:1652-7.
Seldon NR, Quint DJ, Patel N, et al. Emergency magnetic resonance imaging of cervical spinal cord injuries: clinical correlation and prognosis. Neurosurgery. 1999;44:785-92.
Penrod LE, Hegde SK, Ditunno JF Jr. Age effect on prognosis for functional recovery in acute, traumatic central cord syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990;71:963-8.
Rand RW, Crandall PH. Central cord syndrome in hyperextension injuries of the cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1962;44:1415-22.
Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Linacre JM, et al. Performance profiles of the functional independence measure. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;72:84-9.
Karamehmetoglu SS, Karacan I, Elbasi N, et al. The functional independence measure in spinal cord injured patients: comparison of questioning with observational rating. Spinal Cord. 1997;35:22-5.
Stineman MG, Hamilton BB, Goin JE, et al. Functional gain and length of stay for major rehabilitation impairment categories: patterns revealed by function related groups.Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;75:68-78.
Curt A, Keck ME, Dietz V. Functional outcome following spinal cord injury: significance of motor evoked potentials and ASIA scores. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:81-6.
Miyanji F, Furlan JC, Aarabi B, et al. Acute cervical traumatic spinal cord injury: MR imaging findings correlated with neurologic outcome - prospective study with 100 consecutive patients. Radiology. 2007;243:820 -7.
Dai L. Magnetic resonance imaging of acute central cord syndrome: correlation with prognosis. Chin Med Sci J. 2001;16:107-10.
Schaeffer DM, Flanders A, Northrup BE, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of acute cervical spine trauma. Correlation with severity of neurologic injury. Spine. 1989;14:1090-5.
Shepard MJ, Bracken MB. Magnetic resonance imaging and neurological recovery in acute spinal cord injury: observations from the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study 3. Spinal Cord. 1999;37:833.
Rao SC, Fehlings MG. The optimal radiologic method for assessing spinal canal compromise and cord compression in patients with cervical spinal cord injury. I. An evidence-based analysis of the published literature. Spine. 1999;24:598-604.
Fehlings MG, Rao SC, Tator CH, et al. The optimal radiologic method for assessing spinal canal compromise and cord compression in patients with cervical spinal cord injury. II. Results of a multicenter study. Spine. 1999;24:605-13.
Fehlings MG, Furlan JC, Massicotte EM, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of maximum canal compromise and spinal cord compression for evaluation of acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury. Spine. 2006;31:1719-25.
Furlan JC, Fehlings MG, Massicotte EM, et al. A quantitative and reproducible method to assess cord compression and canal stenosis after cervical spine trauma: a study of interrater and intrarater reliability. Spine. 2007;32:2083-91.
Yamazaki T, Yanaka K, Fujita K, et al. Traumatic central cord syndrome: analysis of factors affecting the outcome. Surg Neurol. 2005;63(2):95-99;discussion 9-100.
Uribe J, Green BA, Vanni S, et al. Acute traumatic central cord syndrome-experience using surgical decompression with open door expansive cervical laminoplasty. Surg Neurol. 2005;63(6):505-510; discussion 10.