Female breast is a universal symbol of sexuality, motherhood and femininity today, dating back even to the time of ancient cave paintings. Historically, women have long sought breast enlargement to improve physical proportions, to foster a more feminine appearance, or to enhance self-image. When compared to the aesthetic norm, inadequate breast volume may lead to a negative body image, feelings of inadequacy, and low self-esteem. These disturbances may adversely affect a patient`s interpersonal relationships, sexual fulfillment, and quality of life. Since its introduction in 1962, modern breast augmentation with implants has become one of the most common aesthetic procedures, receiving more media attention than any other. It remains an increasingly popular surgical intervention today where the idealized female physique has morphed from the curvaceous Rubens type to one increasingly thin and androgynous, but with prominent breasts. The popularity of the procedure is thought to be based on the satisfaction of the patients` results. Breast enlargement and reshaping with breast implants nowadays is a safe, well-accepted technique, which can be undertaken with ever-less frequent complications thanks to continued advances in both surgical technique and implant design. The purpose of the present article is to make a brief review of the history of breast augmentation as a surgical procedure and the evolution of breast implants.
Shipley RH, O’Donnell JM, Bader KF.Personality characteristics of women seeking
breastaugmentation, comparison to small-busted and average-busted controls. Plast Reconstr Surg1997; 60(3): 369–76.
Baker JL Jr, Kolin IS, Bartlett ES. Psychosexual dynamics of patients undergoing
mammaryaugmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg1974; 53(6): 652–9.
Cronin TO, Gerow FJ. Augmentation mammoplasty: a new natural feel prosthesis.
Transactions of the Third International Congress of Plastic Surgery, October 13-18, 1963. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica Foundation; 1963; 41-9.
Maxwell GP, Gabriel A. The evolution of breast implants. Clin Plast Surg 2009; 36(1): 1-13.
Terry MD, Skovron ML, Garbers S, et al. The estimated frequency of cosmetic breast
augmentation among U.S. women 1963 through 1988. Am J Public Health 1995; 85(8 Pt 1): 1122-4.
Hetter GP. Satisfaction and dissatisfaction of patients with augmentation mammoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1979; 64(2): 151-5.
Sarwer DB. The psychological aspects of cosmetic breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120(7 Suppl 1): 110S-117S.
Czerny V. Plastic replacement of the breast with a lipoma [in German]. Chir Kong Verhandl 1895;2: 216.
Longacre JJ. Correction of the hypoplastic breast with special reference to reconstruction of the “nipple type breast” with local dermofat pedicle flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1954; 14(6): 431-41.
Picha GJ, Batra MK. Breast augmentation. In: Achauer BM, Eriksson E, Guyuron B, et al,eds. Plastic Surgery: Indications, Operations, and Outcomes. 1st ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2000:2743–56.
Institute of Medicine. Safety of Silicone Breast Implants. Washington, DC: National AcademyPress; 1999.
Bondurant S, Ernster V, Herdman R, eds. Safety of silicone breast implants. Washington, DC:National Academy Press; 2000.
Uchida J. Clinical application of crosslinked dimethylpolysiloxane, restoration of the breast,cheeks, atrophy of infantile paralysis, funnelshaped chest, etc. Jpn J Plast Reconstr Surg 1961;4: 303.
Boo-Chai K. The complications of augmentation mammaplasty by silicone injection. Br J Plast Surg 1969; 22(3): 281-5.
Ortiz-Monasterio F, Trigos I. Management of patients with complications from injections of foreign materials into the breasts. Plast Reconstr Surg1972; 50(1): 42–7.
Brown JB, Fryer MP, Randall P, et al. Silicones in plastic surgery: laboratory and clinical investigations, a preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 1953; 12(5): 374-6.
Marzoni FA, Upchurch SE, Lambert CJ. An experimental study of silicone as a soft tissue substitute. Plast Reconstr Surg 1959; 24: 600-8.
Feng LJ, Amini SB. Analysis of risk factors associated with rupture of silicone gel breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999; 104(4):955-63.
Caffee HH. The influence of silicone bleed on capsule contracture. Ann Plast Surg 1986; 17(4):284-7.
Berry MG, Davies DM. Breast augmentation:Part I- A review of the silicone prosthesis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63(11): 1761-8. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2009.07.047. Epub 2009 Aug 27.
Arion HG. Retromammary prosthesis. C R Soc Fr Gynecol 1965; 5.22. Rees TD, Guy CL, Coburn RJ. The use of inflatable breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg
; 52(6): 609-15.
Young VL, Watson ME. Breast implant research: where we have been, where we are, where we need to go. Clin Plast Surg 2001; 28(3): 451-83.
Lavine OM. Saline inflatable prostheses: 14 years’ experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1993; 17(4):325-30.
Al-Sabounchi S, De Mey AM, Eder H. Textured saline-filled breast implants for augmentation mammaplasty: does overfilling prevent deflation? A long-term follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118(1): 215-22; discussion 223.
Hartley JH. Specific applications of the double lumen prosthesis. Clin Plast Surg 1976; 3(2): 247-63.
Colon GA. The reverse double-lumen prosthesisa preliminary report. Ann Plast Surg 1982; 9(4):293-7.
Becker H. The expandable mammary implant. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987; 79(4): 631-7.
Ashley FL. A new type of breast prosthesis. Preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 1970; 45(5): 421-4.
Capozzi A, Pennisi VR. Clinical experience with polyurethane-covered gel-filled mammary prostheses. Plast Reconstr Surg 1981; 68(4): 512-20.
Melmed EP. Polyurethane implants: a 6-year review of 416 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988; 82(2): 285-90.
Hester TR Jr, Nahai F, Bostwick J, et al. A 5-year experience with polyurethane-covered mammary prostheses for treatment of capsule contracture,
primary augmentation mammoplasty, and breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 1988; 15(4): 569-85.
Sinclair TM, Kerrigan CL, Buntic R. Biodegradation of the polyurethane foam
covering of breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 92(6): 1003-13; discussion 1014.
Hester TR Jr, Tebbetts JB, Maxwell GP.The polyurethane-covered mammary prosthesis: facts and fiction. Clin Plast Surg 2001; 28(3): 579-86.
Maxwell GP, Hammond DC. Breast implants: smooth versus textured. Advances in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 1993; 9: 209.
Danino AM, Basmacioglu P, Saito S, et al. Comparison of the capsular response to the Biocell RTV and Mentor 1600 Siltex breast implant surface texturing: a scanning electron microscopic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;108(7): 2047-52.
Hakelius L, Ohlsen L. Tendency to capsule contracture around smooth and textured gelfilled silicone mammary implants: a 5-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100(6): 1566-9.
Burkhardt B, Eades E. The effect of Biocell texturizing and povidone-iodine irrigation on capsule contracture around saline-inflatable breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 96(6): 1317-25.
Malata CM, Felderg L, Coleman DJ, et al. Textured or smooth implants for breast
augmentation? Three year follow-up of a prospective randomized controlled trial. Br J Plast Surg 1997; 50(2): 99-105.
Burkhardt BR, Demas CP. The effect of Siltex texturing and povidone-iodine irrigation on capsule contracture around saline inflatable breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93(1): 123-8; discussion 129-30.
Heden P, Jernbeck J, Hober M. Breast augmentation with anatomical cohesive-gel
implants. Clin Plast Surg 2001; 28(3): 531-52.
Ersek RA, Salisbury AV. Textured surface, nonsilicone gel breast implants: four years' clinical outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100(7): 1729-39.
Spear SL, Mardini S. Alternative filler materials and new implant designs. Clin Plast Surg 2001; 28(3): 435-43.
Chaudhary S, Cadier MAM. Local tissue reactions to oil-based breast implant bleed. Br J Plast Surg 2000; 53(4): 317-8.
Papanastasiou S, Odili J, Newman P, et al. Are triglyceride breast implants really biocompatible? Ann Plast Surg 2000; 45(2): 172-3; discussion 174-6.
Ashley FL. Further studies on the natural-Y breast prosthesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1972; 49(4): 414-9.
Bronz G. A comparison of naturally shaped and round implants. Aesthet Surg J 2002; 22(3): 238-46. doi: 10.1067/maj.2002.124759
Baeke JL. Breast deformity caused by anatomical or teardrop implant rotation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109(7): 2555-64; discussion 2568-9.
Steinbrech DS, Lerman OZ. Breast implants:background, safety and general considerations. In: In: Aston SJ, Steinbrech DS and Walden JL,eds. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Sounders-Elsevier 2009; 645-60.
Kessler DA, Merkatz RB, Schapiro RA. A call for higher standards for breast implants. JAMA 1993; 270(21): 2607-8.
Kessler DA. The basis of the FDA's decision based on breast implants. N Engl J Med 1992; 326(25): 1713-5.
Hölmich LR, Lipworth L, McLaughlin JK, et al.Breast implant rupture and connective tissue disease: a review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120(7 Suppl 1): 62S-69S.
Deapen D. Breast implants and breast cancer:a review of incidence, detection, mortality, and survival. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (7 Suppl 1): 70S-80S.
Venkataraman S, Hines N, Slanetz PJ. Challenges in mammography: part2, multimodality review of breast augmentation- imaging findings and complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197(6):W1031-45. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7216.
Email this article (Login required) 
