Introduction:
Corneal and amniotic membrane transplantations are the most frequently performed transplantations in the world. Amniotic membrane transplantation demonstrates very high efficiency in the management of the ocular surface damaged by disease or trauma.
Aim:
The goal of the current study is to prospectively follow and analyze the tendency in ocular transplantation in a single center in Bulgaria.
Materials and Methods:
A group of 206 patients were recruited in total for a period of three years. Of them 28 had corneal transplantation and 158 had amniotic membrane transplantation. Corneal transplant patients were pre-registered on the waiting list and operated as emergency cases due to the short period of time in which the corneal material preserves best quality. Patients for amniotic membrane were planned in general, but 1/3 were operated as a matter of emergency (102 planned and 56 urgent). The procedures were performed following the standard protocols.
Results:
The results outline the role of amniotic membrane as a follow-up treatment in 1/3 of the cases. After emergency transplantation of amniotic membrane, 12 cases underwent re-operation—corneal transplantation, and 11 received a planned second amniotic membrane transplant. These findings also highlight the main advantage of amniotic membrane—absence of graft rejection and possibility for unlimited re-grafting. Another highlight is the larger number of corneal dystrophies, which underscores the benefits of amniotic membrane transplantation not only for comfort but also for visual improvement.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, amniotic membrane transplantation in Bulgaria follows the international standards, however, corneal transplantation requires revision including the legal regulations, eye bank protocols, and end-user approaches. In the future, tissue engineering will contribute to the provision of more tissue and facilitation of complicated restauration surgeries of the damaged ocular surface.
Leal-Marin S, Kern T, Hofmann N, Pogozhykh O, Framme C, Börgel M, et al. Human amniotic membrane: A review on tissue engineering, application, and storage. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2020. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34782.
Singh R, Gupta N, Vanathi M, Tandon R. Corneal transplantation in the modern era. Indian J Med Res. 2019;150(1):7-22. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_141_19.
Eleiwa TK, Cook JC, Elsawy AS, Roongpoovapatr V, Volante V, Yoo S, et al. Diagnostic performance of three-dimensional endothelium/Descemet membrane complex thickness maps in active corneal graft rejection. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020;210:48-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.10.022.
Infantes Molina EJ, Celis Sánchez J, Tenias Burilllo JM, Diaz Valle D, Benítez-Del-Castillo JM, Mesa Varona D, et al. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in corneas showing a high or low graft rejection risk. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2019;29(3):295-303. doi: 10.1177/1120672118797287.
Kogan S, Sood A, Granick MS. Amniotic membrane adjuncts and clinical applications in wound healing: A review of the literature. Wounds. 2018;30(6):168-73.
Jirsova K, Jones GLA. Amniotic membrane in ophthalmology: properties, preparation, storage and indications for grafting-a review. Cell Tissue Bank. 2017;18(2):193-204. doi: 10.1007/s10561-017-9618-5.
Hettiarachchi D, Dissanayake VH, Goonasekera HW. Optimizing amniotic membrane tissue banking protocols for ophthalmic use. Cell Tissue Bank. 2016;17(3):387-97. doi: 10.1007/s10561-016-9568-3.
Serna-Ojeda JC, García-Mejía M, Graue-Hernández EO, Navas A, Garfias Y. Short-term results analysis in the allogenic transplantation of limbal stem cells expanded on amniotic membrane in patients with bilateral limbal stem cell deficiency. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2020;36(4):238-46. doi: 10.1089/jop.2019.0147.
Medical Advisory Secretariat. Limbal stem cell transplantation: an evidence-based analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2008;8(7):1-58.
Hos D, Matthaei M, Bock F, Maruyama K, Notara M, Clahsen T, et al. Immune reactions after modern lamellar (DALK, DSAEK, DMEK) versus conventional penetrating corneal transplantation. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2019;73:100768. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2019.07.001.
Hirano K, Tanaka H, Kato K, Araki-Sasaki K. Graft rejection-like reactions in the early postoperative period after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for keratoconus: a retrospective study. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:2315-2322. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S178161.
Ono T, Ishiyama S, Hayashidera T, Mori Y, Nejima R, Miyata K, et al. Twelve-year follow-up of penetrating keratoplasty. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2017;61(2):131-136. doi: 10.1007/s10384-016-0489-2.
Martin DE, Kelly R, Jones GL, Machin H, Pollock GA. Ethical Issues in Transnational Eye Banking. Cornea. 2017;36(2):252-7. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001090.
Kern C, Kortuem K, Wertheimer C, Nilmayer O, Dirisamer M, Priglinger S, et al. Modern corneal eye-banking using a software-based IT management solution. J Ophthalmol. 2018;2018:2645280. doi: 10.1155/2018/2645280.
Chávez-García C, Jiménez-Corona A, Graue-Hernández EO, Zaga-Clavellina V, García-Mejía M, Jiménez-Martínez MC, et al. Ophthalmic indications of amniotic membrane transplantation in Mexico: an eight years Amniotic Membrane Bank experience. Cell Tissue Bank. 2016;17(2):261-8. doi: 10.1007/s10561-015-9540-7.
Email this article (Login required) 
