Introduction: D. folliculorum and D. brevis are two types of obligate ectoparasites in humans that inhabit hair follicles, sebaceous and meibomian glands. Initially considered commensals, now there is growing evidence of their direct or indirect involvement in numerous (mainly chronic) skin and eyelid diseases.
Aim: The present study aims to categorize the information on the methods for diagnosing the diseases associated with Demodex spp. and to specify the morphological characteristics essential for the identification.
Materials and Methods: Various review and meta-analysis articles from the last ten years have been studied, primarily focused on diagnosing demodicosis in humans. The specific morphological features of both species have been visualized with photomicrographic images of some of the positive results.
Results: From the variety of skin testing procedures, the best method to use in outpatient practice is a superficial biopsy with scotch tape. If demodicosis of the eyelids is suspected, the standardized examination method after eyelash removal can be modified by fixing the material with scotch tape, which allows efficient transportation. Implementing the two methods leads to the rapid and accurate identification of these ectoparasites.
Conclusion: The introduction of two new diagnostic techniques in the parasitological laboratories reveals the involvement of Demodex spp. in the pathogenesis of numerous skin and eyelid diseases. This allows dermatologists and ophthalmologists to refine the therapeutic approach in each case, improving the patients’ clinical condition and quality of life faster and more efficiently.
Lacey N, Russell-Hallinan A, Powell FC. Study of Demodex mites: Challenges and Solutions. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016;30(5):764-75. doi: 10.1111/jdv.13517.
Merad Y, Derrar H, Hebri ST, Adjmi-Hamoudi H. Demodex, an Eclectic Mite Living in both Hair and Skin: A Review. J Allerg Res. 2019; 1(1): 1-7.
Zhao YE, Hu L, Wu LP, Ma JX. A meta-analysis of association between acne vulgaris and Demodex infestation. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2012;13(3):192-202. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1100285.
Zhao YE, Wu LP, Hu L, Xu JR. Association of Blepharitis with Demodex: A Meta-analysis, Ophthalmic Epidemiology. 2012; 19 (2): 95-102. doi:10.3109/09286586.2011.642052
Bitton E, Aumond S. Demodex and eye disease: a review. Clin Exp Optom. 2021;104(3):285-94. doi: 10.1111/cxo.13123.
Fromstein SR, Harthan JS, Patel J, Opitz DL. Demodex blepharitis: clinical perspectives. Clin Optom (Auckl). 2018;10:57-63. doi: 10.2147/OPTO.S142708.
Kubanov A., Yulia G, Grevtseva A. Important aspects of Demodex diagnostics. J of Surg. Derm. 2016; 1(1):43-51 doi:10.18282/JSD.V1.I1.42.
Yun CH, Yun JH, Baek JO, Roh JY, Lee JR. Demodex Mite Density Determinations by Standardised Skin Surface Biopsy and Direct Microscopic Examination and Their Relations with Clinical Types and Distribution Patterns. Ann Dermatol. 2017;29(2):137-42. doi: 10.5021/ad.2017.29.2.137.
Litwin D, Chen W, Dzika E, Korycińska J. Human Permanent Ectoparasites; Recent Advances on Biology and Clinical Significance of Demodex Mites: Narrative Review Article. Iran J Parasitol. 2017;12(1):12-21.
Chang YS, Huang YC. Role of Demodex mite infestation in rosacea: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;77(3):441-7.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.03.040.
Alexey K, Yulia G, Kravchenko A. Comparative Evaluation of Methods of Diagnostics of Demodicosis. Clin Dermatol Res J. 2018; 2(3):98-104. doi: 10.4172/2576-1439.1000123
Muntz A, Purslow C, Wolffsohn JS, Craig JP. Improved Demodex diagnosis in the clinical setting using a novel in situ technique. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2020;43(4):345-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2019.11.009.
Logger JGM, de Vries FMC, van Erp PEJ, de Jong EMGJ, Peppelman M, Driessen RJB. Noninvasive objective skin measurement methods for rosacea assessment: a systematic review. Br J Dermatol. 2020;182(1):55-66. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18151.
Pimenta R, Soares-de-Almeida L, Arzberger E, Ferreira J, Leal-Filipe P, Bastos P, et al. Reflectance confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of skin infections and infestations. Dermatol Online J. 2020; 26(3):13030/qt9qz046f1. doi: 10.5070/D3263048026.
Sonthalia S, Agrawal M, Bhatia J, Zeeshan M, Elsamanoudy S, Tiwary P, et al. Entodermoscopy update: a contemporary review on dermoscopy of cutaneous infections and infestations. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2021;12(2):220-236. doi: 10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_559_20.
Nicholls SG, Oakley CL, Tan A, Vote BJ. Demodex species in human ocular disease: new clinicopathological aspects. Int Ophthalmol. 2017;37(1):303-12. doi: 10.1007/s10792-016-0249-9.
Jaworska K, Sławińska M, Sobjanek M, Lipowski P. Ophthalmic manifestations of Demodex spp. infection – what should a dermatologist know? Dermatology Review/Przegląd Dermatologiczny. 2021;108(6):485-503. doi:10.5114/dr.2021.114602.
Wu Y, Wang C, Wang X, Mou Y, Yuan K, Huang X, et al. Advances in Dry Eye Disease Examination Techniques. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;8:826530. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.826530.
Zhang AC, Muntz A, Wang MT, Craig JP, Downie LE. Ocular Demodex: a systematic review of the clinical literature. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2020; 40(4):389-432. doi: 10.1111/opo.12691.
Email this article (Login required) 
