Scientific Online Resource System

Scripta Scientifica Medica

Analysis Of Data From The Aerobic Microbiological Landscape In Adult Patients Operated For Anorectal Abscesses

Elena Hadzhieva, Yordan Kalchev, Dzhevdet Chakarov, Dimitar Hadzhiev

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Systematic analyses and studies on the microbiological spectrum of anorectal abscesses (ARAs) are currently lacking in modern proctology. Microorganisms from the colonic flora lead to retrograde infection of the anorectal glands with the subsequent appearance of ARA.
AIM: The aim of this article is to analyze the frequency, type, and structure of the aerobic microbiological landscape in adult patients operated for ARA.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A detailed analysis of the microbiological agents was performed in 254 operated adult patients, with a total of 274 isolates, which were divided as follows: 188 monocultures, 20 pairs of aerobic microbial associations, and 46 found sterile. Microbiological studies were performed by bacteriological examination of the purulent exudate taken during the operation.
RESULTS: A total of 17 types of microbial cultures were identified. The most common were as follows: E. coli (n=160, 58.4%), Proteus spp. (n=15, 5.5%), Klebsiella spp. (n=11, 4%), Staphylococcus spp. (n=12, 4.4%), Enterococcus faecalis (n=8, 2.9%), Enterobacter cloacae complex (n=6, 2.2%). Monocultures were found in 188 patients (74.0%) and mixed infection with microbial associations in 20 patients (7.9%). Of the isolates, Gram (-) predominated, accounting for 201 (73.3%) strains, and Gram (+) constituted 26 (9.5%).
CONCLUSION: So far, there have been only isolated reports on this issue in our country, without systematic studies. This determines the relevance and importance of our study on the aerobic microbiological landscape in operated adult patients with ARA. Routine microbiological screening should be an integral part of the diagnosis of ARA and of great help in the treatment.


Keywords

anorectal abscess, microbiological culture

Full Text


References

Steele SR, Kumar R, Feingold DL, Rafferty JL, Buie WD; Standards Practice Task Force of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Sur-geons. Practice parameters for the management of perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano. Dis Co-lon Rectum. 2011;54(12):1465-74. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31823122b3.

Alabbad J, Abdul Raheem F, Alkhalifa F, Hassan Y, Al-Banoun A, Alfouzan W. Retrospective clinical and microbiologic analysis of patients with anorec-tal abscess. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2019;20(1):31-4. doi: 10.1089/sur.2018.144.

Hadzhiev BD. Perineal necrotizing fasci-

itis--surgical approaches. Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2008;50(3):40-6.

Tsankov Ts. [On terminology of ano-rectal abscess-es and fistulae]. Khirurgia (Sofia). 2007;(4):44-7.

Xu RW, Tan KK, Chong CS. Bacteriological study in perianal abscess is not useful and not cost-effec-tive. ANZ J Surg. 2016;86(10):782-4. doi: 10.1111/ans.13630.

Yilmazlar T, Gulcu B, Isik O, Ozturk E. Microbio-logical aspects of Fournier‘s gangrene. Int J Surg. 2017;40:135-138. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.02.067.

K R, Biswas R, Bhat P, Sistla S, Kumari S, Kate V. Rare isolation of Fusobacterium varium from a case of Fournier’s gangrene. Anaerobe. 2019;57:82-

doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2019.03.020.

Castillejo Becerra CM, Jaeger CD, Rose JR, Beec-roft NJ, Shah NC, Posid T, et al. Microorgan-isms and antibiogram patterns in fournier’s gan-grene: contemporary experience from a single ter-tiary care center. J Urol. 2020;204(6):1249-55. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001194.

Kuehl R, Tschudin-Sutter S, Siegemund M, Marsch S, Battegay M, Wetterauer C, et al. High mortali-ty of non-fournier necrotizing fasciitis with entero-bacteriales: time to rethink classification? Clin In-fect Dis. 2019;69(1):147-50. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy1011.

Eykyn SJ, Grace RH. The relevance of microbiology in the management of anorectal sepsis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1986;68(5):237-9.

Kufahl JW, Andreasen JJ. Mikrobiologi i rela-tion til analabsces kompliceret med fisteldan-nelse [Microbiology related to anal abscess com-plicated with fistula formation]. Ugeskr Laeger. 1992;154(20):1428-9.

Nicholls G, Heaton ND, Lewis AM. Use of bac-teriology in anorectal sepsis as an indicator

of anal fistula: experience in a distinct gener-

al hospital. J R Soc Med. 1990;83(10):625-6. doi: 10.1177/014107689008301010.

Lalou L, Archer L, Lim P, Kretzmer L, Elhassan AM, Awodiya A, Seretis C. Auditing the routine microbiological examination of pus swabs from uncomplicated perianal abscesses: clinical necessity or old habit? Gastroenterology Res. 2020;13(3):114-

doi: 10.14740/gr1279.

Toyonaga T, Matsushima M, Tanaka Y, Shimojima Y, Matsumura N, Kannyama H, et al. Microbiolog-ical analysis and endoanal ultrasonography for di-agnosis of anal fistula in acute anorectal sepsis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007;22(2):209-13. doi: 10.1007/s00384-006-0121-x.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14748/ssm.v55i0.9248
Array
Article Tools
Email this article (Login required)
About The Authors

Elena Hadzhieva
Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, Bulgaria First Clinic of Surgery, St. George University Hospital, Medical University of Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Bulgaria

Yordan Kalchev
Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology “Prof. Dr. Elissay Yanev”, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Plovdiv Laboratory of Microbiology, St. George University Hospital, Medical University of Plovdiv
Bulgaria

Dzhevdet Chakarov
Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv First Clinic of Surgery, St. George University Hospital, Medical University of Plovdiv
Bulgaria

Dimitar Hadzhiev
Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv First Clinic of Surgery, St. George University Hospital, Medical University of Plovdiv
Bulgaria

Font Size


|