Introduction: The introduction of light-cured resin-based materials is a revolutionary step in restorative dentistry. Despite their wide distribution and daily use, the interaction between visible curing light and composite resins is not understood well enough by most dentists.
Aim: The aim of this study is to check dentists’ level of knowledge about different factors affecting the polymerization process of resin-based composites and the use of light curing units (LCUs).
Materials and Methods: The task was performed by an anonymous questionnaire survey, consisting of 15 questions, which was filled out by 112 dentists from the whole country.
Results and Discussion: The analysis of the results shows that most of the dentists are poorly acquainted with the factors affecting the polymerization of resin-based composites. Dentists often make mistakes when placing their adhesive restorations, which leads to the incomplete polymerization of the material and all the consequences from that – risk of fractures, lower wear resistance, elution of unreacted monomers, higher microleakage, and lower adhesive bonding strength.
Light intensity is one of the main factors that determine the necessary curing time. However, more than the half of the participants in the survey (52%) do not know their LCU’s output and 21% do not use any protection, which leads to a serious risk of eye damage.
Conclusion: It is necessary for dentists to improve their knowledge about LCUs and the polymerization process of resin-based composites, which will significantly increase the longevity of their composite fillings.
Domejean S, Leger S, Maltrait M, Espelid I, Tveit AB, Tubert-Jeannin S. Changes in occlusal caries lesion management in France from 2002 to 2012: a persistent gap between evidence and clinical practice. Caries Res. 2015;49(4):408-16. doi: 10.1159/000381355.
Eklund SA. Trends in dental treatment, 1992 to 2007. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010;141(4):391-9. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0191.
Lynch CD, McConnell RJ, Wilson NH. Trends in the placement of posterior composites in dental schools. J Dent Educ. 2007;71(3):430-4.
Opdam NJM, Bronkhorst E, Roeters J, Loomans BAC. Longevity and reasons for failure of sandwich and total-etch posterior composite resin restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2007;9(5):469-75.
Imazato S, McCabe JF, Tarumi H, Ehara A, Ebisu S. Degree of conversion of composites measured by DTA and FTIR. Dent Mater. 2001;17(2):178–83. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(00)00066-x.
Peutzfeldt A, Sahafi A, Asmussen E. Characterization of resin composites polymerized with plasma arc curing units. Dent Mater. 2000;16(5):330–6. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(00)00025-7.
Ruyter I, Svendsen SA. Remaining methacrylate groups in composite restorative materials. Acta Odontol Scand. 1978;36(2):75–82. doi: 10.3109/00016357809027569.
Indzhov B. Obturatio cavi dentis; 2009. p. 19-34. (in Bulgarian).
Krifka S, Seidenader C, Hiller KA, Schmalz G, Schweikl H. Oxidative stress and cytotoxicity generated by dental composites in human pulp cells. Clin Oral Invest. 2012;16(1):215–24. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0508-5.
Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF, Curtis JW Jr, Davis HC. Factors affecting cure at depths within light-activated resin composites. Am J Dent. 1993;6(2):91–5.
Price R. Avoiding Pitfalls when using a light-curing unit. Compendium of continuing education in dentistry. 2013;34(4):304-5. Available from: https://www.aegisdentalnetwork.com/cced/2013/04/avoiding-pitfalls-when-using-a-light-curing-unit.
Wielgus AR, Roberts JE. Retinal photodamage by endogenous and xenobiotic agents. Photochem Photobiol. 2012;88(6):1320-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2012.01174.x.
Labrie D, Moe J, Price R, Young M, Felix C. Evaluation of Ocular Hazards from 4 Types of Curing Lights. J Can Dent Assoc. 2011;77:b116. Available from: http://www.jcda.ca/article/b116
Kohn W, Collins A, Cleveland J, Harte J, Eklund K, Malvitz D. Guidelines for infection control in dental health-care settings. MWWR Reccom Rep. 2003;52(17):1-61.
Janoowalla Z, Porter K, Sammons RL. Microbial contamination of light curing units: a pilot study. J Infect Preven. 2010;11(6): 217–21.
Tongtaksin A, Leevailoj C. Battery charge affects the stability of light intensity from light- emitting diode light-curing units. Opere Dent. 2017;42(5):497-504. doi: 10.2341/15-294-L.
Rueggeberg FA, Gianni M, Arrais CAG, Price R. Light curing in dentistry and clinical implications: a literature review . Braz Oral Res. 2017;31(suppl.1):61-94. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0061.
Rueggeberg F. Contemporary issues in photocuring. Comp Cont Educ Dent 1999;20(25):4–15.
Price RB, Murphy DG, Derand T. Light energy transmission through cured resin composite and human dentin. Quintessence Int. 2000;31(9):659–67.
Rode KM, KawanoY, Turbino ML. Evaluation of curing light distance on resin composite microhardness and polymerization. Oper Dent. 2007;32(6):571-8. doi: 10.2341/06-163.
Price RB, Labrie D, Rueggeberg FA, Felix CM. Irradiance differences in the violet (405 nm) and blue (460 nm) spectral ranges among dental light-curing units. J. Esthet Restor Dent. 2010;22(6):363–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2010.00368.x.
Email this article (Login required) 
