Scientific Online Resource System

Varna Medical Forum

Contemporary Options For Myopia Control With Progressive Contact Lenses With Center-Distance Design

Mladena Radeva, Lilyana Radkova, Dimitar Grupchev

Abstract

Introduction: Contact lenses with peripheral plus zone, also known as myopia control lenses, have a proven retardation effect on the myopia progression and prevent subsequent complications.

Materials and Methods: Fifteen children at a mean age of 8 ± 2 years with documented progression of myopia over 1 D and a risk calculator with an average of above 4.5 D were adapted to center-distance multifocal lenses with addition +2.0 D. The patients were followed for 2 years by monitoring objective (after cycloplegia) refraction and biometric indicators.

Results: The results were reported every 6 months and showed a reduction of 43% (21% to 85%) of the myopia expected by the calculator. The mean myopia of the first year was 3.27 ± 1.12 D, and for the four subsequent revisions this value changed as follows: 3.96 ± 1.23 D, 4.16 ± 0.97 D, 4.25 ± 1.05 D, and 4.5 ± 0.86 D. The results of the study show easy and fast adaptation of children, excellent effect in anisometropic amblyopia and minimal side effects and complications.

Conclusion: The results of this pilot study demonstrate a significant reduction in myopia progression, good tolerance, parental cooperation, and define soft, progressive lenses with center-distance design, as a successful opportunity for myopia control.


Keywords

myopia, control of myopia, progressive contact lenses

Full Text


References

Holden, B. et al. Myopia, an underrated global challenge to vision: Where the current data takes us on myopia control. Eye (2014). doi:10.1038/eye.2013.256

O’Donoghue, L. et al. Risk factors for childhood myopia: Findings from the NICER study. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. (2015). doi:10.1167/iovs.14-15549

Janowski, M., Bulte, J. W. M., Handa, J. T., Rini, D. & Walczak, P. Concise Review: Using Stem Cells to Prevent the Progression of Myopia-A Concept. Stem Cells (2015). doi:10.1002/stem.1984

Anstice, N. S. & Phillips, J. R. Effect of dual-focus soft contact lens wear on axial myopia progression in children. Ophthalmology (2011). doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.10.035

Gwiazda, J. Treatment options for myopia. Optometry and Vision Science (2009). doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181a6a225

Walline, J. & Smith, M. Controlling myopia progression in children and adolescents. Adolesc. Health. Med. Ther. (2015). doi:10.2147/AHMT.S55834

Vitale, S., Sperduto, R. D. & Ferris, F. L. Increased prevalence of myopia in the United States between 1971-1972 and 1999-2004. Arch. Ophthalmol. (2009). doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.303

Holden, B. A. et al. Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology (2016). doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006

Day, M. & Duffy, L. A. Myopia and defocus : the current understanding. Scand. J. Optom. Vis. Sci. (2011). doi:10.5384/SJOVS.vol4i1p1

Smith, E. L. et al. Effects of optical defocus on refractive development in monkeys: Evidence for local, regionally selective mechanisms. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. (2010). doi:10.1167/iovs.09-4969

Verma, A. & Verma, A. A novel review of the evidence linking myopia and high intelligence. Journal of Ophthalmology (2015). doi:10.1155/2015/271746

Wu, P. C., Tsai, C. L., Wu, H. L., Yang, Y. H. & Kuo, H. K. Outdoor activity during class recess reduces myopia onset and progression in school children. Ophthalmology (2013). doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.11.009

Brennan, N. A. Predicted reduction in high myopia for various degrees of myopia control. Contact Lens Anterior Eye (2012). doi:10.1016/j.clae.2012.08.046

Rosén, R., Lundström, L. & Unsbo, P. Influence of optical defocus on peripheral vision. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. (2011). doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5623

Lam, C. S. Y., Tang, W. C., Tse, D. Y. Y., Tang, Y. Y. & To, C. H. Defocus Incorporated Soft Contact (DISC) lens slows myopia progression in Hong Kong Chinese schoolchildren: A 2-year randomised clinical trial. Br. J. Ophthalmol. (2014). doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303914

Smith, E. L. et al. Effects of foveal ablation on emmetropization and form-deprivation myopia. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. (2007). doi:10.1167/iovs.06-1264

Tan, D., Tay, S. A., Loh, K. L. & Chia, A. Topical atropine in the control of myopia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology (2016). doi:10.1097/APO.0000000000000232

Chua, W. H. et al. Atropine for the Treatment of Childhood Myopia. Ophthalmology (2006). doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.05.062

Chia, A., Lu, Q. S. & Tan, D. Five-Year Clinical Trial on Atropine for the Treatment of Myopia 2 Myopia Control with Atropine 0.01% Eyedrops. Ophthalmology (2016). doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.07.004

Adler, D. & Millodot, M. The possible effect of undercorrection on myopic progression in children. Clin. Exp. Optom. (2006). doi:10.1111/j.1444-0938.2006.00055.x

Gifford, P. & Gifford, K. L. The future of myopia control contact lenses. Optometry and Vision Science (2016). doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000762

Nichols, J. J., Marsich, M. M., Nguyen, M., Barr, J. T. & Bullimore, M. A. Overnight orthokeratology. Optom. Vis. Sci. (2000). doi:10.1097/00006324-200005000-00012

Kakita, T., Hiraoka, T. & Oshika, T. Influence of overnight orthokeratology on axial elongation in childhood myopia. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. (2011). doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5485

Lin, H. J. et al. Overnight orthokeratology is comparable with atropine in controlling myopia. BMC Ophthalmol. (2014). doi:10.1186/1471-2415-14-40

Swarbrick, H. A. Orthokeratology review and update. Clinical and Experimental Optometry (2006). doi:10.1111/j.1444-0938.2006.00044.x

Walline, J. J. Myopia control: A review. Eye and Contact Lens (2016). doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000207

Walline, J. J., Greiner, K. L., McVey, M. E. & Jones-Jordan, L. A. Multifocal contact lens myopia control. Optom. Vis. Sci. (2013). doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000036

Aller, T. A., Liu, M. & Wildsoet, C. F. Myopia control with bifocal contact lenses: A randomized clinical trial. Optom. Vis. Sci. (2016). doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000808




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14748/vmf.v7i0.6126

Refbacks

Font Size


|