The workload in radiology departments has been increasing substantially over the last few decades. This is due to the greater need of tomographic examinations, as well as the increasing number of slices in each examination, determined by the advancements in tomographic technology. In order to ameliorate this, it is necessary to implement means of optimising the workflow of the diagnostic radiologist. Among them the most widely spread and easily accessible are special methods for visualization and image postprocessing – multiplanar reformats, maximum intensity projections, volume rendering techniques, and segmentation. They enable easier differentiation of unclear findings, faster and more reliable discovery of fine small calibre lesions and thrombi, improved spatial orientation and pre-operative planning, as well as acquisition of reproducible and reliable medical scientific measurements. These methods are available as builtin modules in most medical imaging software packages (including ones with an open source) and are an integral part of radiological interpretation, saving time and effort. In the future they can be reinforced with highly specialized artificial intelligence, which could make automatic measurements and locate a specific type of finding.
Barghout L, Lee L. „Perceptual information processing system.“ Paravue Inc. U.S. Patent Application 10/618,543, filed July 11, 2003.
Cardenas CE, Yang J, Anderson BM, Court LE, Brock KB. Advances in Auto-Segmentation. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jul;29(3):185-197. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2019.02.001. PMID:31027636.
Dappa E, Higashigaito K, Fornaro J, Leschka S, Wildermuth S, Alkadhi H. Cinematic rendering - an alternative to volume rendering for 3D computed tomography imaging. Insights Imaging. 2016 Dec;7(6):849-856. doi: 10.1007/s13244-016-0518-1. Epub 2016 Sep 15. PMID:27628743; PMCID: PMC5110476.
Eid M, De Cecco CN, Nance JW Jr, Caruso D, Albrecht MH, Spandorfer AJ, De Santis D, Varga-Szemes A, Schoepf UJ. Cinematic Rendering in CT: A Novel, Lifelike 3D Visualization Technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Aug;209(2):370-379. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.17850. Epub 2017 May 15. PMID: 28504564.
Gajawelli N, Tsao S, Kromnick M, Nelson M, Leporé N. Image Postprocessing Adoption Trends in Clinical Medical Imaging. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Jul;16(7):945-951. doi: 10.1016/j. jacr.2019.01.005. Epub 2019 May 11. PMID:31088712.
Ginat DT, Gupta R. Advances in computed tomography imaging technology. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2014 Jul 11;16:431-53. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-121813-113601. PMID: 25014788.
Griffith B, Kadom N, Straus CM. Radiology Education in the 21st Century: Threats and Opportunities. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Oct;16(10):1482-1487. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 May 16. PMID: 31092349.
Jeong YJ, Lee KS, Yoon YC, Kim TS, Chung MJ, Kim S. Evaluation of small pulmonary arteries by 16-slice multidetector computed tomography: Optimum slab thickness in condensing transaxial images converted into maximum intensity projection images. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2004 Mar-Apr;28(2):195-203. doi: 10.1097/00004728-200403000-00008. PMID: 15091123.
Johnson PT, Horton KM, Fishman EK. Nonvascular mesenteric disease: utility of multidetector CT with 3D volume rendering. Radiographics. 2009 May-Jun;29(3):721-40. doi:10.1148/rg.293085113. PMID: 19448112.
Lee SJ, Liu J, Yao J, Kanarek A, Summers RM, Pickhardt PJ. Fully automated segmentation and quantification of visceral and subcutaneous fat at abdominal CT: application to a longitudinal adult screening cohort. Br J Radiol. 2018 Sep;91(1089):20170968. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170968. Epub 2018 Mar 28. PMID: 29557216
Militello C, Rundo L, Toia P, Conti V, Russo G, Filorizzo C, Maffei E, Cademartiri F, La Grutta L, Midiri M, Vitabile S. A semi-automatic approach for epicardial adipose tissue segmentation and quantification on cardiac CT scans. Comput Biol Med. 2019 Nov;114:103424. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.103424. Epub 2019 Sep 5. PMID: 31521896
OECD (2019), Health at a Glance 2019: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/4dd50c09-en.
Satoh H. Maximum intensity projection technique in the identification of small pulmonary nodules. Tuberk Toraks. 2020 Jul;68(2):195. English. doi: 10.5578/tt.69540. PMID: 32755122.
Shapiro L, Stockman G (2001): “Computer Vision”, pp 279–325, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, ISBN 0-13-030796-3
Smith-Bindman R, Kwan ML, Marlow EC, Theis MK, Bolch W, Cheng SY, Bowles EJA, Duncan JR, Greenlee RT, Kushi LH, Pole JD, Rahm AK, Stout NK, Weinmann S, Miglioretti DL. Trends in Use of Medical Imaging in US Health Care Systems and in Ontario, Canada, 2000-2016. JAMA. 2019 Sep 3;322(9):843-856. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.11456. PMID: 31479136; PMCID:PMC6724186.
Vukicevic M, Mosadegh B, Min JK, Little SH. Cardiac 3D Printing and its Future Directions. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Feb;10(2):171-184. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.12.001. PMID:28183437; PMCID: PMC5664227.
Xia HG, Zhu DQ, Li J, Li X, Sun ZY, Zhu PZ, Zhang HQ, Zhang YM, Wang DB, Miao J. Application of fracture body surface localization film combined with CT volume rendering in the minimally invasive rib fractures internal fixation. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020 Dec;24(24):12948-12954. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202012_24198. PMID: 33378045.
