Настоящата статия има за цел да обсъди предимствата и недостатъците на хирургичните техники, използвани за стесняване на носната база. Известни са редица техники, но правилният избор на достъп и подходяща техника
изисква точна оценка на широчината на носната база и на изграждащите я структури. Прави се заключение, че европейският нос се нуждае от по-консервативна хирургична техника, като най-подходяща се оказва тази на Weir и нейните различни варианти.
------------------------------------------------
The aim of this paper is to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the surgical treatment of the nasal base narrowing. Several different techniques exist, but proper selection of an appropriate approach or combination of techniques first requires evaluation of nasal base width and structure. We
conclude that in most of the cases Caucasian nasal base needs more conservatine surgical treatment. Based on that we prefere Weir’s technique and its modifications.
Bohluli, B., Moharamnejad, N., Amin Yamani, Nasal Base Surgery, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America, Volume 24, Issue 1, February 2012, Pages 87-94
Eric J. Dobratz, Peter A. Hilger Techniques of columellar and alar nasal reconstruction. Original Research Article Operative Techniques in
Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Volume 22, Issue 1, March 2011, Pages 59-64
Wier RF. On restoring sunken noses without scarring the face. N Y Med J. 1892, 56: 449-454
Daniel RK. The Nasal Base: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery-Rhinoplasty. Boston, Mass: Little Brown & Co Inc; 1993: 307-312
Russell W. H. Kridel, Richard D. Castellano. A Simplified Approach to Alar Base Reduction.A Review of 124 Patients Over 20 Years
Bernstein L. Esthetic anatomy of the nose. Laryngoscope. 1972; 82: 1323-1330
Tardy ME, Patt BS, Walter MA. Alar reduction and sculpture: anatomic concepts. Facial Plast Surg. 1993; 9: 295-305