Scientific Online Resource System

International Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology

Videolaryngostroboscopy as a diagnostic method in the clinical practice of otorhinolaryngologists and physicians in dental medicine

Dimo Nedelchev

Abstract

Background
The method of stroboscopy of the larynx makes it possible to examine the movement of the vocal cords, through periodic illumination. Most often electronic videolaryngostroboscopes are used. They allow visualization of the vocal cords.
Methods
The research is conducted using a certain technique. The patient sings a certain vocal, in a tonality that is comfortable for him, and by means of a microphone, the energy of the sound signal is electronically converted into light. Through laryngostroboscopy, patients are examined before and after prosthetic treatment, to assess voice capabilities. Pathological processes or functional dysphonias can also be established.
Results and discussion
There are two possibilities for visual perception when analyzing the phonatory oscillations of the glottis: Frozen, still image of vocal fold movement and A moving image (delayed movements of the vocal folds). Laryngostroboscopy can aid the determination of important questions related to the physiology of voice function, as well as assessment and prognosis of voice capabilities before and after prosthetic treatment.
Conclusions
Laryngostroboscopy is used to study the nature of functional disorders of the voice, preliminary differential diagnosis of benign and malignant neoplasms of the vocal cords, to evaluate the results of treatment, to determine the ability of people to work, the profession that is associated with a large vocal and vocal workload and studies the problems of voice physiology.

Keywords

videolaryngostroboscopy, ENT practice, dental medicine, prosthetics, phoniatrics, vocal disorders

Full Text


References

Wan J, Cai H, Wang T, Chen JY. Influence of pontic design of anterior fixed dental prosthesis on speech: A clinical case study. World J Clin Cases. 2021 Dec 26;9(36):11276-11284. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i36.11276. PMID: 35071558; PMCID: PMC8717503.

Hu S, Wan J, Duan L, Chen J. Influence of pontic design on speech with an anterior fixed dental prosthesis: A clinical study and finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Aug;126(2):204.e1-204.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.06.040. Epub 2020 Dec 3. PMID: 33280825.

Shruthi CS, Poojya R, Ram S, Anupama. Telescopic Overdenture: A Case Report. Int J Biomed Sci. 2017 Mar;13(1):43-47. PMID: 28533736; PMCID: PMC5422644.

de Siqueira GP, dos Santos MB, dos Santos JF, Marchini L. Patients’ expectation and satisfaction with removable dental prosthesis therapy and correlation with patients’ evaluation of the dentists. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013 Jan;71(1):210-4. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2012.654612. Epub 2012 Feb 3. PMID: 22299760.

Hu X, Lin Y, Hunold C, Nelson K. Essentials of standard chinese phonetics for prosthetic dentistry. J Prosthodont. 2013 Aug;22(6):484-9. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12020. Epub 2013 Feb 6. PMID: 23387807.

Broka K, Vidzis A, Grigorjevs J, Sokolovs J, Zigurs G. The influence of the design of removable dentures on patient’s voice quality. Stomatologija. 2013;15(1):20-5. PMID: 23732826.

Hamlet SL, Geoffrey VC, Bartlett DM. Effect of a dental prosthesis on speaker-specific characteristics of voice. J Speech Hear Res. 1976 Dec;19(4):639-50. doi: 10.1044/jshr.1904.639. PMID: 794583.

Zou Y, Zhan D. Patients’ expectation and satisfaction with complete denture before and after the therapy. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2015 Jun;72(6):495-8. doi: 10.2298/vsp140229002z. PMID: 26226720.

Bulycheva EA, Trezubov VN, Alpateva UV, Bulycheva DS. Sound Production in Totally Edentulous Patients Before and After Prosthetic Treatment. J Prosthodont. 2018 Jul;27(6):528-534. doi:10.1111/jopr.12535. Epub 2016 Sep 2. PMID: 27589658.

Abu-Awwad M, Ereifej N, Al-Hattab M, Baker DA, Petridis H. Impact of adding palatal rugae to complete dentures on patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life: A randomized crossover clinical trial. J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Nov;126(5):646-652. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.002. Epub 2020 Oct 8. PMID: 33039185.

Rodrigues Garcia RC, Oliveira VM, Del Bel Cury AA. Effect of new dentures on interocclusal distance during speech. Int J Prosthodont. 2003 Sep-Oct;16(5):533-7. PMID: 14651241.

Li J, Zhang FQ, Chen Y, Wang GM. [Subjective evaluation of acoustic changes before and after restoration with complete denture]. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2003 Aug;12(4):247-9. Chinese. PMID: 14966632.

McAuliffe MJ, Robb MP, Murdoch BE. Acoustic and perceptual analysis of speech adaptation to an artificial palate. Clin Linguist Phon. 2007 Nov-Dec;21(11-12):885-94. doi: 10.1080/02699200701576827. PMID: 17882689.

Hörschgen J, Wisser W, Berger R, Lotzmann U. Der Einfluss der grossen Verbinder von zahnärztlichen Teilprothesen auf die Lautbildung. Eine instrumentalphonetische Untersuchung [The influence of major connectors of partial dentures of phonation: an instrumental analysis of speech]. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2004 May-Jun;56(3):144-56. German. doi: 10.1159/000076936. PMID: 15087570.

Crevier-Buchman L, Pfauwadel-Monfrais MC, Laccourreye O, Jouffre V, Brasnu D, Laccourreye H. La laryngostroboscopie [Laryngostroboscopy]. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac. 1993;110(6):355-7. French. PMID: 8210098.

Sachdeva K, Mittal N, Sachdeva N. Role of Video Laryngostroboscopy in Benign Disease of Larynx. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Jun;72(2):267-273. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-01827-8. Epub 2020 Mar 5. PMID: 32551287; PMCID: PMC7276466.

El-Banna M, Youssef G. Early voice therapy in patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2014;66(6):237-43. doi: 10.1159/000369167. Epub 2015 Feb 5. PMID: 25659839.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14748/orl.v18i4.9067

Refbacks

Font Size


|