Scientific Online Resource System

Scripta Scientifica Medica

Revision total hip replacement using long curved fully hydroxyapatite-coated modular stems with distal interlocking

Kalin Mihov, Maxim Zagorov, Svetoslav Dobrilov, Atanas Tabakov, Georgi Jeliazkov

Abstract


Successful femoral reconstruction in revision total hip replacement needs to address variable metadiaphyseal bone defects and still represents a controversial issue. We present our clinical experience with the use of two types of long revision, curved, fully hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated titanium femoral stems with distal interlocking. A group of 20 patients has been followed up clinically and radiographically for a period of 12.1 months (3-30 months). Indications included aseptic and septic loosening as well as adverse local tissue reactions (ALTR) to metal debris. The major complications in our series included postoperative instability and intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture. Revision curved modular fully HA-coated stems with distal interlocking provide for good primary stem stability and successful secondary osteointegration in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) for both aseptic and septic loosening in the setting of femoral bone defects. Longer follow-up in a larger cohort of patients is needed to confirm the good and very good short-term results and assess femoral bone remodeling.

Keywords

total hip replacement, revision, HA stems

Full Text


References

Mulroy WF, Harris WH. Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second generation cementing techniques for aseptic loosening of the femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996; 78(3):325-30.

Engh CA, Culpepper WJ II, Kassapidis E. Revision of loose cementless femoral prostheses to larger porous coated components. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;(347):168-78.

Geesink RGT, De Groot K, Klein CP. Bonding of bone to apatite-coated implants. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988;70(1):17-22.

Mertl P, Philippot R, Rosset P, Migaud H, Tabutin J, Van de Velde D. Distal locking stem for revision femoral loosening and peri-prosthetic fractures. Int Orthop. 2011;35(2):275-82. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1182-6.

Katz RP, Callaghan JJ, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC. Results of cemented femoral revision total hip arthroplasty using improved cementing techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;(319):178-83.

Singh S, Trikha SP, Edge AJ. Hydroxyapatite ceramic coated femoral stems in young patients: a prospective ten-year study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86(8):1118-23.

Whiteside LA. The effect of stem fit on bone hypertrophy and pain relief in cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;(247):138-47.

Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassman AH. Porous-coated hip replacement: the factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987;69(1):45-55.

Kinov P, Antonov B, Tanchev P, Tsvetanov L, Georgiev G, Tivchev P. Revision of femoral component with modular conical stem by means of distal fixation. Bul J Ortop Trauma. 2017;1:21-5.

Mahomed N, Schatzker J, Hearn T. Biomechanical analysis of a distally interlocked press-fit femoral total hip prosthesis. J Arthroplasty. 1993;8(2):129-32.

Moreland JR, Bernstein ML. Femoral revision hip arthroplasty with uncemented, porous-coated stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;(319):141-50.

Capello WN, D`Antonio JA, Manley MT, Feinberg JR. Hydroxyapatite in total hip arthroplasty: clinical results and critical issues.Clin Orthop. 1998;355:200-11.

Kinov P, Tivchev P. Revision Hip Arthroplasty: Management of Bone Loss Arthroplasty-Update. 2013. Available from: - intechopen.com. doi: 10.5772/53249.

McNally S, Shepperd JA, Mann CV, Walczak JP. The results at nine to twelve years of the use of a hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82(3):378-82.

Cameron HU.The long term success of modular proximal fixation stems in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17(4 Suppl 1):138-41.

Rubash HE, Harris WH. Revision of nonseptic, loose, cemented femoral components using modem cementing techniques. J Arthroplasty.1988;3(3):241-8.

Skinner JA, Kroon PO, Todo S, Scott G. A femoral component with proximal HA coating: an analysis of survival and fixation at up to ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85(3):366-70.

Moreland JR, Moreno MA (2001) Cementless femoral revision arthroplasty of the hip: minimum 5 years follow up. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;(393):194-201.

Paprosky WG, Greidanus NV, Antoniou J (1999) Minimum 10- year results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;(369):230-42.

Sotereanos N, Sweschke J, Raukear GJ, DeMeo PJ, Bargiotas K, Wohlrab D. Revision total hip arthroplasty with a custom cementless stem with distal cross-locking screws. Early results in femora with large proximal segmental deficiencies. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(5):1079-84.

Mousa Y, Ganzoury I, Noaman M. Role of Distal Locking Screws in Stability of Modular Cementless Revision Total Hip Replacement. Res J Med Med Sci. 2009;4(2): 469-74.

May O, Soenen M, Laffargue P, Girard J, Migaud H. Distally locked stems for revision hip arthroplasties with severe femoral bone loss. Results of 101 cases after a mean follow-up of 6 years. Orthopaedic Proceedings.2010;92-B(Suppl 2):305-6.

Estok DM, Harris WH. Long term results of cemented femoral revision surgery using second-generation techniques . An average 11.7-year follow-up evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;(299):190-202.

Weeden SH, Paprosky WG. Minimal 11-year follow-up of extensively porouscoated stems in femoral revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17(4 Suppl 1):134-7.

Fink B, Grossmann A, Fuerst MS. Distal interlocking screws with a modular revision stem for revision total hip arthroplasty in severe bone defect. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25(5):759-65. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.05.019.

Philippot R et al. Femoral deficiency reconstruction using a hydroxyapatite-coated locked modular stem. A series of 43 total hip revisions. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009;95(2):119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2008.09.009.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14748/ssm.v50i1.4149
Array
About The Authors

Kalin Mihov
Medical University of Varna
Bulgaria

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, St. Marina University Hospital, Varna

Maxim Zagorov
Medical Unoversity of Varna
Bulgaria

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, St. Marina University Hospital, Varna

Svetoslav Dobrilov

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, St. Marina University Hospital, Varna

Atanas Tabakov
Medical University of Varna
Bulgaria

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, St. Marina University Hospital, Varna

Georgi Jeliazkov
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, St. Marina University Hospital, Varna

Font Size


|