In recent years, orthodontic dental medicine has progressed at a rapid pace as a result of the use and enhancement of biomaterials. Innovations and improvements in biomaterials have a great impact on orthodontic practice, with significant changes in recent years in the types of materials used as well as their biomechanical requirements. Different types of metals, alloys, polymers, composites, self-polymerizing acrylic plastics are used to create orthodontic materials and appliances. Each of the biomaterials used has its advantages over the others in a particular situation. It is extremely important to evaluate the physical and biomechanical properties of biomaterials in order to achieve predictable results that meet the objectives of orthodontic treatment. From the research it has come to the conclusion that orthodontic dental medicine, like other areas of dentistry, is greatly influenced by the improvements and enhancements of the biomaterials used. Digital technologies, computer design and manufacturing are an integral part of modern orthodontics. New technologies have a great impact on biomaterials used in orthodontics. The right choice of biomaterials for making orthodontic appliances is the key to successful treatment.
Eliades T, Brantley WA, editors. Orthodontic applications of biomaterials: a clinical
guide. Woodhead Publishing; 2017.
Haddad AC, Tortamano A, Souza AL, Oliveira PV. An in vitro comparison of nickel and chromium release from brackets. Braz Oral Res. 2009;23(4):399-406. doi: 10.1590/s1806-83242009000400009.
Schiff N, Dalard F, Lissac M, Morgon L, Grosgogeat B. Corrosion resistance of three orthodontic brackets: a comparative study of three fluoride mouthwashes. Eur J Orthod. 2005;27(6):541-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cji050.
Ratner BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, Lemons, JE, editors. Biomaterials science: an
introduction to materials in medicine. Academic Press; 2013.
Eliades T, Gioka C, Zinelis S, Eliades G, Makou M. Plastic brackets: hardness and associated clinical implications. World J Orthod. 2004;5(1):62-6.
Matsui S, Umezaki E, Komazawa D, Otsuka Y, Suda N. Evaluation of mechanical properties of esthetic brackets. J Dent Biomech. 2015;6:1758736015574401. doi: 10.1177/1758736015574401.
Reddy YG, Sharma R, Singh A, Agrawal V, Agrawal V, Chaturvedi S. The shear bond strengths of metal and ceramic brackets: an in-vitro comparative study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(7):1495-7. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/5435.3172.
Ansari MY, Agarwal DK, Gupta A, Bhattacharya P, Ansar J, Bhandari R. Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets with different base designs: comparative in-vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(11):ZC64-ZC68. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/20624.8910.
Olsen ME, Bishara SE, Boyer DB, Jakobsen JR. Effect of varying etching times on the bond strength of ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;109(4):403-9. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(96)70122-1.
Nikolai RJ. Orthodontic wire: a continuing evolution. Semin Orthod. 1997;3(3):157-65. doi: 10.1016/s1073-8746(97)80066-7.
Kapila S, Sachdeva R. Mechanical properties and clinical applications of orthodontic wires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;96(2):100-9. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(89)90251-5.
Frank CA, Nikolai RJ. A comparative study of frictional resistances between orthodontic bracket and arch wire. Am J Orthod. 1980;78(6):593-609. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(80)90199-2.
Barone S, Paoli A, Razionale AV, Savignano R. Computational design and engineering of polymeric orthodontic aligners. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2017;33(8):e2839. doi: 10.1002/cnm.2839.
Ryokawa H, Miyazaki Y, Fujishima A, Miyazaki T, Maki K. The mechanical
properties of dental thermoplastic materials in a simulated intraoral environment.
Orthod Waves. 2006;65(2):64-72. doi: 10.1016/j.odw.2006.03.003.
Frick A, Rochman A. Characterization of TPU-elastomers by thermal analysis
(DSC). Polym Test. 2004;23(4):413-7. doi: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2003.09.013.
Email this article (Login required) 
