Scientific Online Resource System

Social Medicine

Pilot Study On Patients Attitudes Towards Medical Abortion

Dimitar Marinov, Evgeni Grigorov, V. Belcheva, P. Salchev


The results of the survey conducted with female patients determine their attitude towards medical abortion. This is extremely important for the introduction of the method in Bulgaria. It is true that doctors, with their authority, can often impose their opinion on patients, but if the latter do not have a positive opinion and attitude towards medical abortion, it will not be possible to start using it widely.

The opinion of 124 patients after medical abortion performed by them was studied. The survey is anonymous and was done with their consent, at their last visit of the procedure to the attending physician to confirm a full expulsion. The survey cards were collected in the period April 2018-December 2018. The questionnaires were given to the women by the doctors, who in turn confirmed that they practice medical abortion.

As the age and number of previous pregnancies increase, the effectiveness of drug abortion will decrease, but it is an affordable and desirable alternative for these women.

The group of youngest patients under the age of 18 is not as large as the public may think. Young people are well-informed about contraception, which is causing the overall level of abortion worldwide to decline.

The results show that most drug abortions are performed in larger settlements. This is mainly due to the deployment of healthcare professionals offering the service. Another reason is the tendency of young people of reproductive age to seek economic and social opportunities for themselves and their future generation in more developed large settlements. However, the method is also available to women from smaller towns and villages, although they may have to travel to a nearby larger city to undergo the procedure.


medical abortion, termination of pregnancy, mifepristone, misoprostol

Full Text


Bergström S, Dressler F, Krabisch L, Ryhage R, Sjövall J. The isolation and structureof a smooth muscle stimulating factor in normal sheep and pig lungs. Ark Kern. 1962;(19):63–6.

Bergström S, Dressler F, Ryhage R, Samuelsson B, Sjövall J. The isolation of twofurther prostaglandins from sheep prostate glands. Ark Kern. 1962;(20):563–7.

Bergström S, Ryhage R, Samuelsson B, Sjövall J. The structure of prostaglandin E, F1 and F2. Acta Chem Scand. 1962;16:501–2. Sune K. Bergström. Facts. 1982.

Cowett AA, Lichtenberg ES. Pregnancy Loss and Termination. In: General Gynecology. Elsevier; 2007. p. 225–56.

Abramovitz M, Metters KM. Prostanoid Receptors. In 1998. p. 223–32.

Guillaume A, Rossier C. L’avortement dans le monde. État des lieux des législations, mesures, tendances et conséquences. Population (Paris). 2018;73(2):225.

Balter M. PROFILE: For “Father” of Abortion Drug, Vindication at Last. Science (80- ). 2000 Oct;290(5489):39–39.

Hanna KE. A Political History of RU-486. Inst Med Comm to Study Decis Making, Washingt Natl Acad Press. 1991;

News WH. Brief History of the Abortion Pill in the U.S. WebMD Heal News [Internet]. Available from:

Newton D, Bayly C, McNamee K, Hardiman A, Bismark M, Webster A, et al. How do women seeking abortion choose between surgical and medical abortion? Perspectives from abortion service providers. Aust New Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol [Internet]. 2016 Oct;56(5):523–9. Available from:

Cameron S. Recent advances in improving the effectiveness and reducing the complications of abortion. F1000Research [Internet]. 2018 Dec 2;7:1881. Available from:

Kanstrup C, Mäkelä M, Hauskov Graungaard A. Women’s reasons for choosing abortion method: A systematic literature review. Scand J Public Health [Internet]. 2018 Dec 9;46(8):835–45. Available from:

Magro Malosso ER, Saccone G, Simonetti B, Squillante M, Berghella V. US trends in abortion and preterm birth. J Matern Neonatal Med [Internet]. 2018 Sep 17;31(18):2463–7. Available from:



Font Size