Introduction: Impingement syndrome is one of the most common pathologies affecting the shoulder girdle, comprising almost 60% of all complaints in the glenohumeral joint. It is characterized by pain, reduced range of motion (ROM), and severely decreased functional and work capacity of the upper limb. If left untreated, the condition can lead to severe tissue alterations and complications, such as adhesive capsulitis and partial or complete tears of the rotator cuff. When properly diagnosed, shoulder impingement can be treated successfully with physiotherapy, as well as with treatment modalities such as dry needling.
Aim: The aim of the current report is to assess the effectiveness of applying physiotherapy combined with the dry needling treatment modality in patients suffering from shoulder impingement syndrome who chose a non-operative option as part of their recovery routine.
Methods: A total of 10 patients, divided into two groups of 5, participated in our study. The first group received only a traditional physiotherapy program and was designated the control group. The second group received a traditional physiotherapy program with the addition of the dry needling treatment modality and was designated the experimental group. Measurements and data regarding active range of motion (ROM), VAS results, manual muscle testing, and the functional assessment scale were collected at the beginning and end of the study.
Results and Discussion: The experimental group that received the dry needling treatment modality in addition to the traditional physiotherapy program achieved significantly higher results compared to the control group. The mean end value for shoulder flexion was 15 degrees higher compared to the control group. The mean end values for abduction and the UCLA functional assessment scale (32 points) were identical for both groups.
Conclusion: The collected data in the current study indicate that physiotherapy combined with the dry needling treatment modality can significantly decrease pain and increase recovery potential in patients suffering from shoulder impingement syndrome.
Blanco-Diaz M, Riuz-Redondo R, Escobio-Pierto I, De la Fuente-Costa M, Albornoz-Cabella M, Casana J. A systematic review of the effectiveness of dry needling in subacromial syndrome. Biology (Basel). 2022; 11:0-20.
Chang KW. Shoulder impingement syndrome. Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America. 2004; 15:493-510.
Creech JA, Silver S. Shoulder Impingement Syndrome. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing.2023.
Dhillon KS. Subacromial impingement syndrome of the shoulder: A musculoskeletal disorder or a medical myth? Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal. 2019;13: 1-7.
Dong W, Goost H, Bo Lin X, Burger C, Paul C, Wang Z, et al. Treatments for shoulder impingement syndrome: A PRISMA systematic review and network meta-analysis. Medicine. 2015;94:1-17.
Farfaras S, Roshani L, Mulder J, Mitsios N, Hallström EK, Kartus J. Increased levels of inflammatory markers in the subscapularis tendon and joint capsule in patients with subacromial impingement. Knee surgery, Sports traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2021; 29:(7): 2228-2236.
Griswold D, Learman K, Ickert E, Tapp A, Ross O. Dry needling for subacromial pain syndrome: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Pain Medicine. 2023; 24(7): 917-921.
Hando BR, Rhon DI, Cleland JA, Snodgrass SJ. Dry needling in addition to standard physical therapy treatment for sub-acromial pain syndrome. A randomized controlled trial protocol. 2018; 23: 355-363.
Hanratty C, Kerr D, Wilson I, McCracken M, Sim J, Basford J, McVeigh. Physical therapists’ perceptions and use of exercise in the management of subacromial shoulder impingement syndrome: Focus Group Study. Physical Therapy. 2011; 96: 1353 -1363.
Klemt C, Prinhold J, Morgans S, Smith S, Nolte D, Reilly P, et al. Analysis of shoulder compressive and shear forces during functional activities of daily life. Clinical Biomechanics. 2018; 54: 34-41.
Koester M, George M, Kuhn J. Shoulder impingement syndrome. The American journal of medicine. 2005; 118:452-455.
Land H, Gordon S. Clinical assessment of factors associated with subacromial shoulder impingement: a systematic review. Physical Therapy Reviews. 2017; 3:(6): 196-206.
Laramée A, Léonard G, Morin M, Roch M, Gaudreault N. Neurophysiological and psychological effects of dry versus sham needling of the infraspinatus muscle in patients with chronic shoulder pain: a randomized feasibility study. Laramée et al. Archives of Physiotherapy. 2021; 11-23.
Lee SC, Kim YJ. Intramuscular Stimulation (IMS). Pain and Treatment. 2014; 230-238.
Legge D. A history of dry needling. Journal of musculoskeletal pain. 2014; 22:(3): 301-307.
Lewis SJ, (2013). Subacromial impingement syndrome: a musculoskeletal condition or a clinical illusion? Physical Therapy Reviews. 2013; 16:(5): 388-398.
Liu L, Huang QM, Ye G, Bo CZ, Chen MJ, Li P. Effectiveness of dry needling for myofascial trigger points associated with neck and shoulder pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2015; 96:(4): 944-955.
Ludewig PM, Braman JP. Shoulder impingement: biomechanical considerations in rehabilitation. Manual Therapy. 2011; 16:(1): 33-39.
Page P. (2011). Shoulder muscle imbalance and subacromial impingement syndrome in overhead athletes. The international journal of sports physical therapy. 2011; 6: 51-58.
Pai MYB, Toma JT, Kaziyama HHS, Listik C, Galhardoni R, Yeng LT, et al. Dry needling has lasting analgesic effect in shoulder pain: a double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Pain reports. 2021; 6: 1-9.
Shah J. Integrating dry needling with new concepts of myofascial pain, muscle physiology, and sensitization. Integrative Pain Medicine. 2008; 107-121.
Tejera-Falcon E, Toledo-Martel N, Sosa-Medina F, Santana-Gonzales F, Quiantana-de la Fe M., Gallego- Izquierdo T, et al. Dry needling in a manual physiotherapy and therapeutic exercise protocol for patients with chronic mechanical shoulder pain of unspecific origin: a protocol of randomized trial. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2017; 18:1-12.
